Well, considering that a single scientist would not have the requisite knowledge on Biology, geology, embryology, genetics, Paleontology, physics, astrophysics, and propulsion systems, this hypothetical situation is not even in the realm of plausibility. Now, if teams of credentialed scientists were tasked to research these individual subjects and their studies found enomalies, I would be interested to learn what they had discovered. I would obviously be skeptical at first considering that there is so much evidence supporting the reality of these three subjects. For instance, evolution has the weight of 150 years of concordant research on its side.
As a scientist, Richard Dawkins believes the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is an accurate explanation of the evolution of life on Earth. He does not seem to have expressed an opinion on Charles Darwin as a person.
A theory is useless if it cannot be tested and verified/disproven. That is the purpose of experiments.
Jean Lamark was the scientist that first described evolution as a process of adaptation.
Darwin
Copernicus is a famous scientist. He is not related to evolution. Evolution is the gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex form. Copernicus is a human scientist. These two are not related.
this of what?
took? Evolution wasn't an event. Its an ongoing process
Herbert Spencer
by making theories
Darwin is the most famous one and he proposed the Theory of Evolution.
The theory of evolution by natural selection. Charles Darwin. A+
hypothesis