The militia participation in the war helped the colonists to become a unified, fighting force quickly, shortening the duration of the conflict
guerrilla is a military warfare that most militias use. militia is groups of people armed with guns The american revolution is a good example of guerrilla warfare and militias Militants are like a basic trained soldier that would only take 2-4 months to train rather 8-12 months plus advanced training So in short terms...No guerrilla and militia is not the same thing
The colonists described this event as a massacre so that the other colonies would join together to get the soldiers off their land.
no
They feared the Communists would win control.
They seceded from the USA, because they knew that Lincoln would not allow any new slavestates. They began to take steps to secede from the Union.
If the colonist hade lost the war their taxation would go up.
A person who settles in a colony would be a colonist.
180 pounds
180 pounds
180 pounds
militias
They would say no, but due to Sudan's support of the Arabic militias, i would say yes.
The colonist worried that the states would split up. At first the colonist did not want to be a nation.
militias
No. The game didn't happen until the 1880's, so a colonist would not have known about the game.
there would be more protection
Britain taxed the colonist because the need the money for the troops. The troops help protect the colonist for the Indians. If there was no money to help the soldiers the colonist would die.