At that distance, there would be no planet - just vaporised gasses.
No planet is under only nine million miles from earth - the nearest planet to us (at closest approach in our respective orbits) is Venus which would get as low as about 26 million miles distance.
Not quite sure what the intended question was - - - which star are you asking about? The sun IS a star - the one our planet orbits.
The length of the planet's year would be affected.
No, Venus does not orbit a planet. It orbits a star, which is our Sun. It can not orbit a planet , if it did it would be a moon
No. For one thing, a planet-like object that orbits a planet is a moon, not a planet. Mars does have two moons but they are captured asteroids, and would not be considered planets if the had their own orbits around the sun.
i do not this answer that's why i am asking you this answer.
No. If Ceres orbited a planet it would be a moon. It orbits the sun, so it is classified as a dwarf planet.
We would call that body a "planet" of the star.
Ganymede is regarded as a moon because it orbits a planet. In order to be considered a planet it would have to orbit the sun.
By definition, a planet is a celestial body that orbits a star (the sun) directly. A satellite is an object in space that orbits a planet. Mercury, which is comparable in size to our Moon, orbits the sun. Therefore, Mercury is a planet. Our Moon is a satellite of Earth. If it had its own path around the sun, we wouldn't have a moon and it would be considered a planet.
If a planet was discovered 1.1 billion miles away from the sun, it would be closest to Saturn and Uranus in our solar system. Saturn is about 886 million miles away from the sun, and Uranus is about 1.78 billion miles away from the sun.
If planets did not have their own orbits, they would not follow predictable paths around the sun, leading to chaos in our solar system. This would disrupt gravitational balances and likely result in collisions between planets or the sun, ultimately destabilizing the entire system.