0
they already are
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When were the first nuclear weapons introduced to the Japanese?
A strange way to describe it - 'introduced'. 'I would like you to meet a nuclear weapon......' The bombs were dropped on civilian cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, without any warning, in August 1945.
Why would there be a WW3?
Probabaly Iran launching a nuclear warhead at us because of the "you-should-be-more-like-us" harassment, the missile supplied by their friend, Russia, leading to nuclear war followed by nuclear winter, and the human race dies out.(hope the nuke is their most powerful non-nuclear weapon in their arsenal instead.)
For a story what US Navy ships would carry nuclear missiles?
Mainly aircraft carriers, submarines and some frigates. Personally, I think that all classes of warships can carry nuclear weapon launchers in terms of placement. If a frigate can carry a nuclear missile launcher, a destroyer can do it as well. Of course, when a different class of warship is chosen to carry nuclear weapons, military enginners will study the best location to install the machine. In other words, there isn't a warship specially designed to carry such weapon launcher. Aircraft carriers and submarines are systematically equipped with those nuclear missile launchers due to their characteristics, specially super aircraft carriers.
What was the effect when nuclear weapons were developed in World War 2?
The immediate effect was that Japan sued for peace. There is a movement underway to condemn the Americans (even in their own country) for the use of the nuclear weapon. Given the situation at the time, a new untried weapon would have been justified. There was no possible way to know what the consequences of nuclear weapons would be. Now, over 60 years later, nuclear energy has a history. Then, in World War 2, it was new, untried, and very likely could have failed. Sadly, war is just that...WAR. The objective is to win the war with as little human loss as possible. When new technology is developed, no one knows what the consequences will be in the future.
What weapon which used the main extraction of pitchblende as fuel?
Pitchblende is uranium ore, so any nuclear weapon which used uranium in some form or other (tamper, core, used with plutonium, secondary casing) would need uranium, which is initially obtained from the mining and refining of pitchblende, for example, Little Boy.
How many rads does a nuclear weapon produce?
That would vary from weapon to weapon.
What would happen if a nuck was sucked into a black hole?
I suppose you mean a nuclear weapon. It would get destroyed just like anything else.
What safety is there of having a nuclear weapon?
A nuclear weapon is used to prevent being threatened by other nuclear countries. Say, for example, France got rid of all of it's nuclear weapons, tiny countries that had a nuclear weapon would be able to bully them into accepting bad deals or presurring them into not reacting when things happen. Most countries in the world would probably like to dispose of their nuclear weapons but they can not due to the fact of little countries with problems that will keep them would be able to threaten them and hold the world by it's throat.
What is a country you would not trust with a nuclear weapon?
Iran
What is a country that you would not trust with a nuclear weapon?
iraq
Would placing missiles in both Japan and South Korea actually deter North Korean from launching a nuclear missile or would that move actually backfire?
It would have a null effect. Currently, the US Navy and US submarines are deployed around the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago. There are nuclear missiles within range of hitting North Korea. Any deterrence that having nuclear weapon on Japanese or Korean soil would have is the same as what is already being achieved.
What would happen if uranium wasn't extracted?
No nuclear energy, no nuclear weapons
If a nuclear weapon exploded on a nuclear Power Plant would the explosion radius increase?
No, but there would be more release of radioactivity because the reactor itself would probably be melted in the explosion.
What Countries you would not trust with a nuclear weapon?
I think that north Korea is one and an other is china.
What would happen to a cell if it had no nuclear membrane?
The world would explode
What is a precision nuclear weapon?
The term precision nuclear weapon may be a misnomer, but it is generally used to describe a low yield nuclear weapon (perhaps a few kilotons) that can be delivered with great accuracy on a specific target.The idea is to use this device, which is very small compared to an equivalent conventional weapon, in applications like busting deeply buried bunkers or other large below ground installations. Using a nuclear weapon in this type of application would gain a more assured result than the use of conventional explosives. The catch is that if you have this wonderfully effective weapon with all these superior characteristics, you may be tempted to use it.It may or may not be helpful to compare the precision nuclear weapon to what we call a tactical nuclear weapon. This nuclear device has a low yield (about a kiloton or so) that was designed to be delivered by conventional large-bore cannon or a small missile. The limited blast could be directed in a way that it could destroy something like a concentration of armored vehicles or troops that it would be difficult to do with conventional explosives. Consider that a small tactical nuclear weapon that could fit inside a 155 mm cannon shell would do damage that a thousand tons of TNT would be needed to accomplish.
What would happen if you were resting with your head on your arms on the steering wheel and the air bag deployed?
if you were about under 12 you would get really hurt
