i don`t think that is possible,but the seasons and days will increase ore decrease in length and temp and life will not evolve as we now it.but i think life will evolve however it will be a lot different then life as we know it
The person's velocity would be 0 km/h since they are not moving in relation to the surface of the Earth. Their velocity would only change if they start moving relative to the surface, but standing still means their velocity is 0.
If there is no rotation of the Earth, the days and nights would not exist as we know them. One side of the Earth would be in perpetual darkness, while the other side would be in constant daylight. The atmosphere and climate patterns would also be significantly altered, leading to extreme weather conditions.
No, it is not. This will seem wrong to people who are aware that the moon's orbit it tidally locked with earth. Observed over a long enough period, the moon has a distinct wobble that comes from what is called libration. It results from the fact that the moon's orbital velocity around the earth is not constant, while the moon's rotational velocity is for all practical purposes constant. So the earth will appear to move a bit in the lunar sky. This is an apparent motion and not a true motion. It occurs to me that there must be places on the moon where the earth would appear, over the course of a lunar cycle, unable to decide whether to rise or to set! It would appear to bob up and down at the moon's horizon.
we will have the same weather when the earth stopped at that moment like for example when the earth stopped spinning in the day like at two in the afternoon than it will stay sunny in that area for eterninty get it don't contact me at the weather man.com
Not as water. But water is made of hydrogen and oxygen, so... The mass of hydrogen gas is low enough that the kinetic theory of gases describes an average velocity close to the escape velocity from Earth. At upper atmosphere temperatures, there is insufficient thermal energy to boost significant amounts of anything except hydrogen to escape velocity. Losing hydrogen will decrease the amount of water, so this would be a down side of making lots of hydrogen for powering cars (and such). "Spills" would / could reduce the amount of hydrogen on Earth.
If the Earth suddenly lost its constant velocity, it would result in drastic changes to our environment causing catastrophic events such as massive earthquakes, tsunamis, and extreme weather patterns. The loss of constant velocity would disrupt ecosystems, potentially leading to widespread destruction and loss of life.
There would be a lot of chaos. Seasons would be off, some places would be colder while others warmer.
The velocity in the x direction would be constant because gravity only affects the vertical components of objects. The velocity in the y direction would increase due to the constant acceleration due to gravity. The acceleration due to gravity on Earth is always -9.81 m/s^2.
The earth's constant orbit around the sun is caused by an equilibrium between two forces - the gravitational pull of the sun, and the earth's velocity acting at a right angle to it. If that gravitational pull was suddenly eliminated, the earth would continue onwards in a straight line.
The slope of a time-distance chart would be a constant. The slope of a time-velocity chart would be 0.
In a theoretical scenario with constant velocity, the true acceleration would typically be zero.
the speed would have to change.
The acceleration would be zero because the turtle is moving at a constant speed
God set it in perfect motion/velocity so it would orbit the earth which would otherwise come crashing down to earth making a big mess of things.
No. The definition of acceleration is change in velocity.
Speed is a scalar quantity meaning it has only magnitude. Velocity is a vector meaning it has magnitude and direction. Whilst the satellite's speed is constant its direction is constantly changing. If its direction didn't change it would fly off in a straight line. Since its direction is changing, the velocity must be changing. And also since the velocity is changing, the satellite is also accelerating (towards the centre of the earth).
If the velocity is constant there is no acceleration. Speed is not velocity, velocity has speed and direction. I A car going around a circular track at 60 mph keeps the same speed but changes direction and thus accelerates at a constant speed. Velocity is speed in a certain direction. So change the speed but keep direction the same and you change the velocity. or Change the direction while keeping the speed the same and you change the velocity. If the speed is constant, any change of direction is a change in velocity. Driving around in a circle is a case of constantly changing direction.