the speed would have to change.
In a theoretical scenario with constant velocity, the true acceleration would typically be zero.
No, a particle with position given by 𝑥(𝑡) = 𝐴𝑡 + 𝐵 is not moving with constant velocity, it is moving with a constant acceleration since its position is changing linearly with time. Velocity would be given by the derivative of 𝑥(𝑡) which would be a constant.
It's not. If you speed is constant (but not zero), then your velocity won't be zero, either.You may be confusing this with the following: If your VELOCITY (not your speed) is constant, then your ACCELERATION is zero. Acceleration refers to how quickly velocity changes, so if velocity doesn't change at all, acceleration is zero.
The slope of a time-distance chart would be a constant. The slope of a time-velocity chart would be 0.
Yes, in the absence of air resistance, a projectile launched into space at any angle will have a constant horizontal velocity. This is because there are no horizontal forces acting on the projectile once it is launched.
To make acceleration equal zero. The velocity must be constant. For example, if velocity is constant at 10 m/s^2 its acceleration is zero. The same is true if velocity is 0 m/s^2.
The acceleration would be zero because the turtle is moving at a constant speed
No. The definition of acceleration is change in velocity.
"Acceleration" means change of velocity. If velocity is constant, then acceleration is zero.
False. A body traveling at constant speed does not change its velocity, which includes both speed and direction. Therefore, in order to change direction, the body would need to change its velocity, which also involves changing its speed.
The velocity does not change direction or magnitude. The object 1) may not be moving, or it 2) may be moving at a constant velocity. In the case of the latter, that means it's moving in the same direction and at a constant speed.
In order for an object to travel with constant velocity the sum of forces acting on it must be zero