Lizards in deserts eat insects, and are in turn eaten by snakes, birds and other animals in this subtly diverse biome. Removal of lizards would allow insect populations to increase, and those creatures that prey on lizards would not fare as well. The system of life there would be out of balance, and a new equilibrium would appear. This new profile of desert fauna may or may not be "better" for the desert biome, but it will be different, and the loss of the lizards may turn out to be a "bad" thing.
Lizards are essential because they eat nasty insects like mosquitoes, grasshoppers, cockroaches, etc. Without lizards, the whole world would be filled with so many nasty insects which could sound pretty scary. Also, the snakes eat the lizards, so the snake will be affected and the animals higher on the food chain would also be affected and so on and fourth.
we would die
If both lungs were removed, the person would die.
Sweat
It wil be on
It dies.
it would die :*(
nothing it depends on what factor was removed
Nothing would happen at all.
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)