well even though this is incredibly unlikely, there is a simple answer. the offspring would be unable to produce completely healthy offspring themselves this offspring would usually have some sort of disorder. that is if the 1st offspring were male female identical. if not, if they are all one sex then they would just not be able to mate. there fore in both instances the population would die out. no 3rd generation
If all offspring were identical, the population would lack genetic diversity. This lack of diversity could make the population more vulnerable to diseases or changes in the environment. It could also limit the adaptability of the population to new conditions or challenges.
If a population has abudant space and foor, and is protected from predators and disease, then organisms in that population will multiply and the population size will increase.
If the deer population increased fivefold, it could lead to overgrazing of vegetation, which could disrupt the ecosystem by decreasing plant diversity and altering habitats. This could also result in more frequent conflicts with humans, such as vehicle collisions and damage to crops. Additionally, an increase in deer population could potentially lead to an increase in disease transmission within the deer population.
The growth of the population would be 3% each year. This means that the population size would increase by 3% of its current size every year.
True. If a disease significantly reduced the rabbit population, it would also impact the coyote population in the same environment, as coyotes rely on rabbits as a food source. With fewer rabbits available, the coyote population would likely suffer from decreased food supply, potentially leading to a decline in their population as well.
Population implosion refers to a rapid and drastic decline in the population of a region or a country. This can be caused by factors such as low birth rates, high death rates, and emigration. Population implosions can have significant social and economic consequences, such as labor shortages and declining economic growth.
no. Since they are identical, their phenotype, or physical appearance, would be identical as well. hope that helps :)
The offspring of a asexual organism will always be identical to the parent cell because it is never gaining new information like it would if it were sexual.
The characteristic of a population that would most likely indicate the lowest potential for evolutionary change in that population would be asexual reproduction. This is because the offspring are identical to the parent.
The majority of the offspring population has functioning wings.
i believe its c. produce identical offspring...
None of the offspring would have colored spots..
No, the offspring of identical parents would not always look like the parents because everyone has dominant and recessive traits, where the recessive traits do not show but is still in DNA. That said, recessive traits not shown in parents can be passed on as dominant traits to offspring - making offspring not always identical to its parents. (this is also called genetic variation)
Sort of, yes. Meiosis gives offspring a random mixture of their parents genes. The likelihood of multiple offspring having the same random mixture is very small, but very similar mixtures happen frequently and result in strong family resemblance. Offspring aren't identical to each other because they get these different mixtures. If each child had DNA identical to one of their parents then there would be a 50% chance for two children born to the same parents to look exactly the same.
The population would grow massively out of check and leaders would have to turn to methods of reducing the population such as a one child policy. Otherwise the earth's resources would be depleted. . :}
That would be a very unusual situation. Note that due to the normal process of genetic reshuffling that is involved in human reproduction, the children of the two couples would not be genetically identical even though their parents are.
remain the same
Nothing