The rabbit population would increase because their prey would not be eating them anymore. Although the wolves would probably increase back because the remaining wolves would eat and have a young. So it goes vice versa. ♥ Hope I answered :3 ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ hope i answered it good for u
BTW if u wanna make a heart press alt for a long time while u press number 3 on the pad on the right ♥ :)
The population would decrease. APEX ...
you would starve and die it's as simple as that!
it will increase
The number of wolves would slowly fall because in Yellowstone elk are the what wolves prey on the most.
if scientists want to solve an environment problem, they are most likely to use ___.
True. If a disease significantly reduced the rabbit population, it would also impact the coyote population in the same environment, as coyotes rely on rabbits as a food source. With fewer rabbits available, the coyote population would likely suffer from decreased food supply, potentially leading to a decline in their population as well.
The population of the things that eat slugs would decrease and so would the thing that eats that and eats that and eats that and so on the whole food chain would get mixed up -mk
If the population of mealworms decreased, the population of mice would likely decline as well. Mealworms serve as a food source for many small mammals, including mice, so a reduction in their availability would lead to decreased food resources. This could result in increased competition for other food sources, higher mortality rates among mice, and potentially lower reproductive rates, ultimately causing a decrease in the overall mouse population.
If the carrying capacity suddenly decreased, you could probably expect the amount of organisms within the ecosystem to decrease as well. (There is a decreased amount of room/resources for the organisms, causing the quantity of organisms to decrease as well.) hope that helps :)
The sentence is logically inconsistent because it states that the rabbit population increased after all the grass died and the wolves left their habitat, implying that the rabbits thrived in unfavorable conditions. In reality, the death of all the grass would likely lead to a decrease in the rabbit population due to lack of food. Additionally, the absence of wolves might lead to an increase in the rabbit population, not a decrease.
It would get bigger
In the first 6 months, the rabbit population would likely increase due to more food availability from the plant population. After 5 years, if the rabbit population continues to grow rapidly, it may exceed the carrying capacity of the environment, leading to resource depletion and a decline in both rabbit and plant populations.