all of the prey would have to increase then more carnivores would be able to eat
Without carnivores, herbivore populations would likely increase rapidly, leading to overgrazing of plant species. This could result in the decline or extinction of certain plant species, disrupting the entire ecosystem. Additionally, the absence of carnivores could also cause imbalances in predator-prey relationships, potentially leading to an increase in certain herbivore populations and a decrease in others.
Else they wouldn't be carnivores. They would be omnivores
Hawks are carnivores, AND there are hawks in Africa.
Carnivores depend on producers for their survival because producers create the food chain by converting sunlight into energy through photosynthesis. Carnivores rely on herbivores, which consume producers, for their food source. Therefore, without producers, there would be no foundation for the food chain to support carnivores.
They are carnivores as well.
they would just die
Carnivores in the food chain would eat cows. This is because carnivores eat meat and cows have meat in them.
Plants produce food Herbivores eat plants Carnivores eat herbivores Thus to keep everyone fed there have to be more plants than there are herbivores to eat them (or the herbivores would starve) and more herbivores than carnivores (or the carnivores would starve).
If all predators disappeared, the number of herbivores and smaller carnivores will increase in number.
it would be carnivores because if you think of dinosaurs, it would actually be carnivores because they eat plants and plants have seeds growing.
herbivores dont matter. without carnivores no animals would be eaten
affect the community