It would depend on the President. It would also depend on how the president was chosen and how long his term lasted. A good president would be good and a bad president would be terrible.
If the President has restricted powers to declare a disaster, the only people hurt would be the citizens. Common sense should be the predominant factor, not a restricted law that would tie the president's hands.
Jefferson and the Republicans believed in state rights over a strong central government. If seemingly unlimited powers were awarded to the national government, they would be no different than the British monarchy. While a national government was essential, Jefferson and his party believed their powers should be curtailed so not to conflict with state rights.
majin vegeta. he has unlimited powers. he even bet goku
he would have to be voted out of his powers by the vice president and by the house of repersentives
The Speaker of the House of Representatives is next in line of succession.
If only Congress held military powers, then any action would be too slow; with the president holding military powers, a quick, immediate response could be made without political squabbling.
The Speaker of the House of Representatives is the next in line of succession.
If the president dies whilst still ruling his country, all his powers are given to the vice president of that country. For example, if President Obama (President of the United States of America) died, all his powers would go to the Vice President Joe Biden.
Separation of powers and the system of checks and balances
It would be Unlimited Travel since the word unlimited is plural.
President James Monroe.
George Washington expanded the powers of the president when he ordered military to go and fight Indians in the west with out approval from Congress. He would often make decisions about fighting the Indians and would inform Congress only after the fact.