Want this question answered?
The country of Vietnam had divided into communist North Vietnam and democratic South Vietnam, and was fighting a civil war to determine if the country would be reunified as a communist nation, or if it would remain a divided nation. Untimately, North Vietnam prevailed.
they all thought it would be a short conflict over by Christmas because each country believed it was the strongest because of nationalism and militarism.
The Vietnam War (1954-1975) resulted from the conflict of factions in the country after the French were defeated in 1954. The northern half of the country had adopted the communist ideology of China, while the southern half was controlled by dissident generals and former French interests, and established a free enterprise system. Beginning with guerrilla insurgencies, the North attempted to regain control of the South. In the Cold War period, the US supported South Vietnam while the USSR supported North Vietnam, conducting the major proxy war of the late twentieth century.
Estimates are that it would have taken about another year to accumulate forces, invade and subdue Japan's home islands. This would have involved Soviet forces with all that implies.
No, wars are not a good way to end conflict between two countries or individual. Wars bring destruction and nothing else. It results in the loss of resources as well as lives. Wars are not the solution of any conflict. Mutual understanding and conversation are the basis of better results for any conflict. Wars bring down the economic conditions of the country as well. Throughout the history, no war has ever ended a conflict. One war has either led to another war or cold war or war-like circumstances. So wars are not at all a good way to end conflicts between countries or individuals. Gandhi won a war without even fighting one.
The U.S senate did not want the country to join.
There are many different types of conflict such as internal or external. Another example would be perceived conflict which is simply the awareness of a conflict situation.
Treaties can be used to settle disputes between government officials of one country and citizens of Another Country. They can permit a country to act on behalf of another country in certain circumstances. They can facilitate trade by providing for less duties and taxes than would normally be paid in a cross-border transaction.
Treaties can be used to settle disputes between government officials of one country and citizens of Another Country. They can permit a country to act on behalf of another country in certain circumstances. They can facilitate trade by providing for less duties and taxes than would normally be paid in a cross-border transaction.
I would say if a country has a defensive treaty alliance with another country it would mean that they would not fight with that country, but also that if the country they had the alliance with were to be attacked by another country that they would help to defend them.
Madison reasoned that the opposing party would feel victimized that the government is "disregarding the rights of another or the good of the whole," as Madison put it. And this negligence felt by either party would cause conflict not only between the parties, but in the country as well. Also, the people felt factions would rip their beloved country apart, that they fought hard for in the Revolutionary War they just came out of.
The Vietnam War No, it would have been Korea
The best word I know for that would be chim.
There are many conflict methods available to help achieve amicable solutions to disagreements. One such method would be mediation which involves a third party to help mediate the process. Mediation would require all parties to recognize the legitimate abilities of one another.
I would belive the external conflict would be Leon vs. Society. Because it was something rare to combine two beleifs. Native rituals with Catholic rituals.
Countries can affect each other through economic interactions such as trade and investment, political relationships through diplomacy and alliances, and social influences through cultural exchanges and migration. Additionally, conflicts or crises in one country can have ripple effects on others through factors like immigration, security threats, and changes in global markets.
A. Latent Conflict-potential B. Perceived Conflict-realizes goals impeded by another party C. Felt Conflict-growing anger D. Manifest Conflict-how to deal with it E. Conflict Aftermath-what would I do differently?