They say a cockroach might; bacteria certainly would.
I put Biochemistry above because I heard that Four out of the Five Mass Extinctions on Earth were caused by our Earth being almost completely over ridden by Oxygen-hating purple-cyano-bacteria; the fifth was the 63 million-year-old Dinosaur killing asteroid.
Short Answer is Mammals and Insects.
It would generate a global catastrophe.
So the sick and elderly don't have to survive on the streets if a financial catastrophe hits their lives.
The plural is catastrophes but would be pronounced as "catastro-fees".
Insect populations would increase and the animals that prey on them would start to decrees. It would eventually create a chain reaction of animals dying out. It could mean a global catastrophe. All animals are here on earth for a reason.
no, a catastrophe would be like the world ending. a crisis would be like needing new shoes and not being able to get them.
We would not be faced with this oncoming catastrophe.
A debacle (or a catastrophe, if you would rather).
Al Gore has been an effective promoter of environmental causes, particularly the concern about global warming. I don't know if, in the future, he will be given credit for helping to prevent a global catastrophe, since we don't really know yet if there will be a global catastrophe or if we will be able to prevent it, however, Al Gore will certainly be given credit for making people more aware of the issues involved.
Maybe Once Every Few Thousand Years.
There was an asteroid impact in the Yucatan Peninsula, about 65 million years ago, which caused global catastrophe for the existing species of the time.
No, of course not.
what up niigers