The sense of sight is your visual sense.
The ears .
It all depends the situation. If a meerkat guard, or sentry, is watching for predators, then the sense it would most rely on would be sight. But meerkats have to use their sense of smell to identify other meerkats. Sight and Scent are probably the senses meerkats rely on the most.
Visual means pertaining to sight. So if I said for instance "the entertainment was very visual", I would mean that the entertainment was exciting to my sense of sight.
No.If the points on the graph are connected then they are already connected so it would be complete waste of time to connect them.
touch Really? I thought it was sight because the eyes are always building an image. Everytime you look at something your eyes are making that image and making the image is more complicated than it looks.
Of course.If i were behind a bush and made noise you would here it but i am not in sight.[[User:71.242.231.85|71.242.231.85]]DoDo
unless that lan is connected to a router that is connected to a modem that can access internet... it would make no sense
sight Consider this : If you had a choice of which four senses you would lose, or which sense would you not wish to lose most of all, the answer becomes clear.
No, depending on what type of animal. Bats, for example, are nocturnal animals but they use echolocation, so it would count as the touch sense, and the smell sense. Other animals, and jungle cats, use scent and sight, mostly to hunt prey and get around. Of course they have the other senses, they just might not be as sharp or useful as their eye sight.
You would ask if it makes sense.
You could rewrite the senses of a human with possessive nouns by phrasing them as "the human's sense of sight," "the human's sense of hearing," "the human's sense of taste," "the human's sense of touch," and "the human's sense of smell."
There is no opposite for the verb hear, although the opposite sense (sight) would be "see."The adjective heard has antonyms such as unheardor misheard.