0
What would you say if you believed in oscillating universe theory?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
"I believe in the oscillating universe theory."
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which universe is earth in?
There exists only one known universe and the Earth is in it. Even if the theory of multiple dimensions was proven, the Earth would actually still exist in all of those separate dimensions at once.
How would you use theory in a sentence?
How would you use theory in a sentence
What is the theory called for the continents joined together?
That theory would probably be Pangaea. The theory for the movement of continents is called the Continental Drift Theory.
How can they estimate the number of atoms in the universe?
The no. of atoms in the Universe is not estimated yet because till now we are not able to calculate the amount of matter present in the universe and what is the exact percentage of each element in the universe. Once it is calculated, scientists would be able to calculate the no. of atoms in the universe.
What are 3 problems with the nebular theory?
The first problem with the theory is that the sun rotates too slow for the theory to explain. Another problem is that the sun would fly apart if it were as explained in the theory. Also to make the theory work all of the planets would have exactly the same axis tilts.
Can another big bang theory happen?
Hypothetically "maybe," depending on your intent for the action of repeating. Regardless of the theoretical implications for cosmology, the Chaos Theory demonstrates the improbability of an exact duplication of our universe. However if the question is meant to refer to the ideology of the Oscillating Universe Theory, then it is "maybe." And such a hypothesis would depend on what was before our creation event, or how our traditional fourth dimensional reality was brought into existence. Also while the Oscillating Universe Theory provides for more of a linear view of the possibility for multiple universes, the Multiverse hypothesis provides for more of a parallel view of the possibilities for multiple universe.
Can the universe repeat itself?
Hypothetically "maybe," depending on your intent for the action of repeating. Regardless of the theoretical implications for cosmology, the Chaos Theory demonstrates the improbability of an exact duplication of our universe. However if the question is meant to refer to the ideology of the Oscillating Universe Theory, then it is "maybe." And such a hypothesis would depend on what was before our creation event, or how our traditional fourth dimensional reality was brought into existence. Also while the Oscillating Universe Theory provides for more of a linear view of the possibility for multiple universes, the Multiverse hypothesis provides for more of a parallel view of the possibilities for multiple universe. For a more specific answer, please qualify the intent for the verb "repeat."
What is the Oscialla universe theory?
I assume you mean the oscillating Universe. That refers to the idea that the expansion of the Universe will eventually revert, the Universe will contract again, all the matter will get together into an extremely small space, but from there it would expand again (and again, and again...). In practice, this still won't make our Universe last forever, due to the Second Law of Thermodynamics (entropy can still only increase!). In any case, the current observational evidence is that the Universe is expanding faster and faster - not slowing down - so the oscillating (cyclic) model is not very likely.
Why did some people oppose the heliocentric theory of the universe?
Most of these people were religious, and because the scriptures supposedly said that the Earth was in the center of the universe (geocentric), they had to stand firm with their beliefs. Only scientists and astronomers believed in the heliocentric theory, and some of them would be excommunicated or almost executed if they weren't geocentric.
Would the laws of physics be different in a new universe according to the Cyclic Universe Theory?
Yes
What would pythagorean have believed about the nature of the universe?
He would have likely agreed with classic Newtonian physics. Look up the string theory. It makes Einstein's absoluteness belief and quantum mechanics' relativity ideas converge together.
Why Aristotle believe in geocentric?
Aristotle believed in a geocentric model of the universe because it aligned with his concept of natural motion, where he believed that the Earth was the center of the universe and that celestial bodies moved in uniform circular motion around it. This perspective was also supported by observations of apparent motion of celestial bodies in the sky.
What do you call the theory that the universe began as a very hot and dense concentration of matter?
That would be the Big Bang theory.
Does this expanding universe model mean that the milky way galaxy is the center of the universe?
No it does not. It is my basic understanding of this theory that the 'true center' of the universe would be mostly devoid of material.
Who created the many bang theory?
"Who" depends on your intent for the subject, "many bang theory." Since there is not a named theory known as the "many bang theory," the question provide for multiple probabilities. There are two obvious considerations for multiple Big Bangs: i.e. the Oscillating Universe Theory and the Multiverse hypothesis. While the Oscillating Universe Theory provides for more of a linear view of the possibility for multiple universes, the Multiverse hypothesis provides for more of a parallel view of the possibilities for multiple universe. The oscillatory universe theory is a hypothesis credited to Richard Tolman who saw it as a possible outcome of the Big Bang. When it is stated as credited, it should be known that the oscillating universe theory was briefly considered by Albert Einstein in 1930 in which he theorized a universe following an eternal series of oscillations, each beginning with a Big Bang and ending with a Big Crunch. However, the work by Richard C. Tolman in 1934 showed that there was a problem with Einstein's calculations; i.e. according to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, entropy can only increase for this linear view of multiple universes. This concept therefore implied that successive cycles grow longer and larger, and it became the first successfully feasible description for an oscillatory universe. The multiverse is the hypothetical set of multiple possible universes. The term was coined in 1895 by the American philosopher and psychologist William James. The concept promoted that these various universes within the multiverse, sometimes called parallel universes, would together comprise everything that exists and can exist: the entirety of space, time, matter, and energy as well as the physical laws and constants that describe them. Thus the first conciliation that our defined "universe at large" was not just including our traditional fourth dimensional existence (i.e. the reality that we call our universe), but rather a multiple consideration for a universal medium with many such realities: e.g."alternative universes", "quantum universes", "interpenetrating dimensions", "parallel dimensions", "parallel worlds", "alternative realities", "alternative timelines", and "dimensional planes," among others.
What model of universe creation is supported by the red shift?
All modern models based on science that are worth their salt would be. The only major theory I know about the origin of the universe is the Big Bang Theory, which is supported by Red Shift observations. Galaxies we can observe are all moving away (we know this due to Red Shift) from a central point, believed to be the epicenter of the Big Bang.
Whose theory of the universe was held as law for thousands of years even though the theory was falsified?
The Ptolemaic theory of the planets was believed to be right for 1400 years until Copernicus suggested that the Sun might be at the centre and not the Earth. Although Copernicus's theory was not correct, is was soon replaced by Kepler's theory which has been supported by further scientific discoveries throughout the 400 years since it was published.
