Using embryonic stem cells is unethical for many people, especially if they were only created for stem cell research.
adult body cells have a function where as embryonic stem cells have no set function as of that stage. now there are some adult stem cells and those have little to no difference than embryonic stem cells
adult body cells have a function where as embryonic stem cells have no set function as of that stage. now there are some adult stem cells and those have little to no difference than embryonic stem cells
Adult stem cells are better than embryonic stem cells in some ways because they have less risk of immune rejection, as they can be collected from the patient's own body. Additionally, the use of adult stem cells avoids the ethical concerns surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells. Adult stem cells have also shown promising results in various treatments and therapies.
Some global opinions supporting the use of embryonic stem cells stem from their potential to treat various diseases and conditions, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and spinal cord injuries. Additionally, proponents argue that the research on embryonic stem cells can lead to medical advancements and better understanding of human development. Many believe that the benefits of using embryonic stem cells in research and therapy outweigh ethical concerns.
Active telomerase is commonly found in stem cells, germ cells, and cancer cells. It is also present in some cells undergoing rapid proliferation, such as embryonic cells.
Yes, embryonic stem cells tend to elicit more controversy and raise ethical concerns compared to adult stem cells. This is because obtaining embryonic stem cells usually involves the destruction of human embryos, which some people view as morally objectionable. Adult stem cells, on the other hand, are obtained without harming embryos and are therefore generally accepted with fewer ethical objections.
they can cure human diseases but the question is should we use them.
Because the (human) embryos are frozen and they are readily available and will be destroyed if not implanted in a womb of a potential mother. Unfortunately, people see the frozen embryonic cell as an opportunity to do science. Some researchers feel that throwing out frozen embryonic cells is a waste. A scientist goal is to improve the value of human life by finding a value in the human embryonic cell. It would be like using a person, without permission, to make another person either get better or live longer. The moral problem is that it takes the life of another human to gain the advantage for a supposedly superior being. Another reason is because of the promise of embryonic stem cells is just to consuming to a research scientist. They can make a lot of money, and cure some serious diseases by using the embryonic stem cell. Another reason is that the federal funds to do the research have been available since 2008. If the government sponsors this type of research, then more scientists will use the government (USA) money to keep their projects funded. It is important to know that even though initial tests in embryonic stem cells looked promising, more can also be done with adult stem cells, without harming the potential for human life. Also, so called hybrid-stem cells that can be reverted back to stem cell status from an adult stem cell has made big progress in 2011-12. Both hybrid and adult stem cell research can be done without hurting the potential for life.
The umbilical cord has stem cells in it. Baby teeth are another possible source of stem cells.
Pene grande
they could potentially grow new organs
Some common cryoprotectants used for embryonic stem cells include dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol, and ethylene glycol. These cryoprotectants help protect the cells from damage during the freezing and thawing process by reducing ice crystal formation and cellular osmotic stress.