Yes, in English, when addressing a centurion specifically by their title, it is capitalized, like "Centurion," as it is a formal title of rank.
In formal writing or when directly addressing someone, Marine title Gunny (short for Gunnery Sergeant) is capitalized. In general text or casual conversation, it is typically not capitalized.
Not in ordinary usage, they are not proper nouns. Of course, if they begin a sentence or are part of a title, they should be capitalized. And some publishers still follow the convention of capitalizing pronouns that refer to the Deity.
Yes, you should capitalize the word "President" when referring to the title of the President of a company as it is a formal title. For example, "The President of the company called a meeting."
No, not every word in a movie title is capitalized. Typically, only the first word and proper nouns are capitalized in a movie title.
Yes, "are" should be capitalized if it is the first word in a title.
Yes, 'My Lady' is capitalized when addressing a noble as it is considered a sign of importance.
A noun is capitalized when it is the name of a person or place. Therefore, when you are addressing a manager by their title, you would capitalize: "Yes, Manager". When you are referring to a manager, and not using as a replacement for their name, you would not capitalize.
In a title, the main words like nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs are typically capitalized, while articles like "a" and "is" are not unless they are the first word of the title.
In a title, only the first word, the last word, and all major words are typically capitalized. Minor words like "and," "or," and "but" are not usually capitalized unless they are the first or last word of the title.
A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.
No. Of course it may depend on the usage, but prepositions are not normally capitalized in a title.
no
no
Capitalized it when it is the first and last word of the title
Yes, the word "into" should be capitalized in a title if it is the first word, last word, or any other major word according to title capitalization rules.
The title "dean" should only be capitalized when it comes before a name, for example: Dean Smith. Otherwise, if used generically (e.g. "the dean of students"), it should not be capitalized.
Yes, "are" should be capitalized if it is the first word in a title.