Who says they ever had the right? States rights, and the right to suceed secede from the Union was one of the key factors involved in causing the Civil War. They really don't have the right, at least not without giving a lot of federal money away and losing the military support. The infrastructure has become so complex that it would be practically impossible to do so in today's world.
they have the lawful right, but as shown during the civil war the gov will make up any reason to call it unjust.
Lincoln viewed secession as a constitutional crisis that threatened the Union, believing that states did not have the right to unilaterally withdraw from it. Conversely, Robert E. Lee recognized secession as a states' right but regarded it as an act of anarchy that undermined the nation’s unity. While both men acknowledged the concept of states' rights, their interpretations led them to fundamentally different conclusions about the legitimacy and consequences of secession.
States have the right to withdraw front the Union
Gentleman of Mississippi. has written: 'Secession, considered as a right in the states composing the late American union of states, and as to the grounds of justification of the southern states in exercising the right' -- subject(s): Secession, State rights
No, Texas is not the only state that has retained its right to secession. While Texas has a unique history regarding its admission to the United States and has sometimes been cited in discussions about secession, no state has a legally recognized right to secede. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Texas v. White (1869) that states cannot unilaterally secede from the Union. Other states may have historical claims or discussions around secession, but these have no legal standing.
In 1861, the legality of secession was a contentious issue. Some argued that states had the right to secede from the Union, while others believed that the Constitution did not allow for secession. Ultimately, the Civil War settled the question, with the Union victory establishing that secession was not constitutional.
The question of whether the southern states had the right to secede is complex and often debated. From a constitutional perspective, many argue that the Union was intended to be perpetual, and secession violated the Constitution. Additionally, the motivations behind secession, primarily the defense of slavery, raise moral and ethical concerns. Ultimately, while states' rights were a significant issue, the legal and moral implications of secession suggest that it was not justified.
They justified secession with the theory of states' rights.
I think you are looking for secession! If so, it is the assumed right of states to leave the Union as in the American Civil War
As respective presidents of the United States and the Confederate States of America, Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis were diametrically opposed on the issues of states' rights in respect to secession. What this fundamentally meant was that Lincoln was unalterably opposed to, while Davis was fully in favor of, this right.
Secession
He would state they would defend the right of the States and their way of life.
Technically no. The constitution provides no protection for secession regardless of what hte 10th amendment reads.