For many scholars the Monarchy in England became powerless, more or less, with the removal of James IInd in 1688. James reigned by Divine Right in many people's minds. He was God's anointed. He was also King by the law of inheritance and this law affected even the poorest and was well understood!
When James fled, a thread was broken on a silver chain, an essenial part of Government was shaken. Later James was followed not by his lawful son, but by his nephew and his daughter, to remain King on a hostile throne, William of Orange had to maintain an Army of some 10,000 men to overaw the English people! William was a Calvinist. William in turn was followed by another member of the family , the youngest daughter. It certainly weakened the ties between Crown and People. After Queen Anne died in 1714, she was succeeded by George the First, a boor of a man, who couldn't speak English and was personally distasteful to the people of England . Further he was suspected of murdering his wife's lover and had very little claim to the English throne! Also he was a Lutheran in an Anglican world and fathered a disfunctional family.
Most people realised that George, especially, was a King of convenience, certain politicians had seized power, and George was a puppet. There seems to have been a tacit agreement that the Hannover Family were socially at the top while real power remained with the Junta. [The Devonshire Family and friends.]
Modern scholars think or claim that England has been a republic since the so-called Glorious Revolution.
why is monarcy not used in England
Colonial leaders, being from Britain themselves, were both against and for war against the British. The British was the premier superpower nation at the time. With a superior navy and army, there was no one that had the guts to oppose the Brits. But the colonial leaders knew that unless a war was to be fought, there was no chance at secession from the British empire.
taxes were to high
Like the U.S. and the other western countries, Britain wanted to stop the spread of communism.
People could head West now that Britain can not stop them.
Yes, Neither Britain or France has attacked a US ship for many years.
U.S.A then Britain the russia
After World war 2 Britain became bankrupt and ruined like the rest of Europe, old superpowers like Germany overcame to the influence of the ussr and the us.Britain had no longer enough money to fund the colonies so after several decades the british empire had collapsed.
being a shield
Economy in the 1980s
unipolarity This was the answer for the £1000 Sunday Express Xword 16072 33a.) The state of being dominated by one superpower, especially US (11 letters)
UNIPOLARITYunipolarityunitochracy
America is a superpower, meaning that it generally has a higher position of power than other countries. It is currently the world's last superpower.
Britain, France, USSR, and USA fit the model. USA was large and rich.
unitochracy
No, Vietnam is not a superpower.
A superpower in recovery maybe.
Seymour J Deitchman has written: 'On being a superpower'