They didn't. In the 17th century they there were several wars between the two countries, All fought by the navy. The issues were about the right to claim colonies and trade routes.
Traditionally, it's told the Netherlands revolted because of religion. In the 16th century the Protestant Netherlands were part of Catholic Spain. Another view is that the Dutch (nobles) became Protestant so they could revolt, and that they actually had economic motives for the revolt.
i dont know hahaha
Yes, Netherlands is pretty to England. However, against popular believe, everyone in the Netherlands speaks AMERICAN ENGLISH.
England and the Netherlands were both Protestant.
Elizabeth
Basically, by the lack of respect received by England. The taxes and rules the King had were a few of many things that led the Americans to revolt against England.
No. France did not revolt against Napoleon.
In the 17th Century, the Spanish Crown had difficulty suppressing a revolt in the Netherlands because of the difficulty in raising an army.
Robert the Bruce did not lead a revolt against King Edward. The wars were to maintain Scottish independence from an aggressive rival kingdom, England, who were never in a position of authority over Scotland which we could revolt against. This was a war between nations, not a rebellion of subjects. Well said.
Basically, by the lack of respect received by England. The taxes and rules the King had were a few of many things that led the Americans to revolt against England.
It was unlikely that the powers in England believed the American colonists would be in full revolt. By the time the rebellion began, the British were not fully prepared to fight a war.
the southern Netherlands