It means England can't tax them without someone to represent them.
"No taxation without representation!"
"No taxation without representation".
"taxation without representation " the colonist where mad because they didn't have a say in what to do in parliament they just chose for them.
"taxation without representation " the colonist where mad because they didn't have a say in what to do in parliament they just chose for them.
The colonists' cry over "no taxation without representation" was made for the sake of achieving a more equitable relationship with their English home-country. In the view of the American residents of the North American colonies, it was unjust that England should tax them without allowing them any direct say (via political representation) in the passing and enforcing of governing laws. Hence, without representation, they protested, they would allow no taxation.
No
Taxation without representation is tyranny means that it is unfair to have to pay taxes if uyou dont have a say in it............ Taxation without representation is tyranny means that it is unfair to have to pay taxes if uyou dont have a say in it............
The Stamp Act, among others, increased taxes on the colonists without them having any say over it. "Taxation without representation" was a major grievance of the colonists.
taxation without representation
No. Jonathan Mayhew did
No taxation without representation.
i dont get what u are trying to say