That really depends on what government you are talking about.
If the American government were to stop funding Social Security, public schools, and public transportation, the immediate effects on the economy would be severe. Social Security cuts would increase poverty rates among the elderly, leading to reduced consumer spending. The elimination of funding for public schools would result in a less educated workforce, hindering economic growth and innovation. Additionally, cutting public transportation funding would limit accessibility to jobs and services, exacerbating economic inequality and reducing overall productivity.
They should not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
to keep the government running when the budget has not been approved
to keep the government running when the budget has not been approved
to keep the government running when the budget has not been approved
I don't think they should.
to keep the government running when the budget has not been approved
to keep the government running when the budget has not been approved
If the American government were to stop funding Social Security, public schools, and public transportation, it could lead to significant economic instability. A reduction in Social Security could increase poverty rates among the elderly, straining healthcare systems and reducing consumer spending. Cutting funding for public schools might result in a less educated workforce, harming long-term economic growth and productivity. Additionally, decreased investment in public transportation could hinder mobility, affecting job access and overall economic efficiency.
He will not sign a bill to defund acorn. As he has stated...They will always have a seat at his table. The government stopped funding ACORN in 2009.
pass legislation known as "stop-gap funding" to keep the government running
In Australia, the government are funding $2.3 million to stop land clearing.