0
American civil war
Kelli Prosacco
The military has historically hired civilians for various roles, such as support staff and contractors. However, the practice of actively recruiting and hiring civilians on a large scale began during World War II, when there was a significant need for additional manpower to support the war effort. This included hiring civilians for administrative, technical, and other non-combat roles.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When did U.S. Military first begin hiring civilian employees?
American civil war
When did the us first begin hiring civilian employees?
American civil war
When did the US military first begin hiring civilians?
American civil war
When did the military first begin hiring civilians employees?
American civil war
When did the us military first begin hiring civilians employees?
American civil war
When were springfield rifles first introduced?
which Springfield? The military arsenal, or the civilian company?
When did the first hummer come out?
1985 was when the first HMMWV (Hummer) was produced by AM General. It was a standard military vehicle. The first civilian versions was produced in 1992.
Can police officer in the army reserve be exempt from deploying because of their civilian job?
No. The military comes first. Civilian agencies know this, and are required to hold your job for you until you get back.
How long have hummers been around?
The first civilian Hummer was sold in 1992, however the military version the Humvee was first used in 1984.
First street legal hummer?
First civilian version was produced in 1992 by AM General. The military versions are street legal and the first one was produced in 1985.
When did the US first begin giving military support in Vietnam?
The 1950s
When does civilian law supersede military law?
Civilian law is typically always in place. Military law is only invoked in extreme emergencies. However, military personnel are always subject to military law. The Adjutant General will negotiate with the civilian authorities if there is any situation where it is not definite as to which takes precedence. Actually, in the United States, no military person (or, for that matter, anyone other than the Judical Branch) can arbitrarily decide to enforce military law in a place where it is not currently in place. Not even the President can decide to apply military law in a place where civil law is currently in force (indeed, this is one of the major contentious issues around the classification of terrorists as "enemy combatants", and the legality of this move is still being subject to litigation). The misnowmer "martial law" does not actually apply Military Law, but rather enforce a certain subsection of civilian law. For instance, let's say that there is major rioting in a city, and the National Guard is called in to restore order, and "martial law" is declared by the city's major (or perhaps, the state governor). Members of the National Guard are subject to Military law, and any infractions they commit will naturally be covered by military trial. HOWEVER, should a National Guardsman capture a looter (or other criminal), they are then prosecuted under CIVILIAN LAW, even though "martial law" was declared. Martial law in this case is a specific subsection of civilian law, which criminalizes certain activities which are normally permissible under ordinary civilian law. Back to the original question: as Congress is the creator of both military and civilian law, it can decide whether civilian or military law applies in a situation where the military normally has first jurisdiction. There are a myriad number of places this can occur, so naming them all is not possible. In addition, the Constitution is still the highest law of the land, and is supreme over both military and civilian law. Do note that many crimes are not covered by military law, but only civilian law, so it is entirely possible for a person normally subject to military jurisdiction to be prosecuted by civilian authorities without military acquiecence. For example, Insider Trading is a civilian crime, with no military equivalent, so it would be entirely possible to charge a military serviceperson on a military base with this civilian crime.
