0
What else can I help you with?
Did the ancient roman army lose its discipline and thus endanger the empire and cause it to be overrun?
Yes, the loss of discipline of the army was one of the reasons for the fall of the empire.
Did the roman empire lose its discipline and thus endanger the roman empire and cause it to be overrun?
The loss of discipline to the Roman army(again western empire) occurred late in the fall of Rome. It was largely caused by the sheer influx of foreign/barbarian troops to fill the legions that Roman citizens would not do. So I'd say no.
Who is considered the founder of the Eastern Roman Empire?
There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.
Why did the civilization crash before the renaissance?
Loss of the Roman empire
What were the causes of the Decline of Loyalty and Discipline in military that led to the fall of roman empire?
The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was precipitated by the invasions of this part of the empire by the Germanic peoples, rather than citizens indifference and loss of patriotism. It was said that many citizens were indifferent to these invasions because they were not worse than the Roman government. This attitude was due to resentment towards the oppressive taxation regime which the Roman state needed to fund a large army and a bloated bureaucracy.
What were the causes of decline of loyalty and discipline in military that led to the fall of the Roman empire?
The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was precipitated by the invasions of this part of the empire by the Germanic peoples, rather than citizens indifference and loss of patriotism. It was said that many citizens were indifferent to these invasions because they were not worse than the Roman government. This attitude was due to resentment towards the oppressive taxation regime which the Roman state needed to fund a large army and a bloated bureaucracy.
What were the causes of citizen indifference and loss of patriotism that led to the fall of the roman empire?
The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was precipitated by the invasions of this part of the empire by the Germanic peoples, rather than citizens indifference and loss of patriotism. It was said that many citizens were indifferent to these invasions because they were not worse than the Roman government. This attitude was due to resentment towards the oppressive taxation regime which the Roman state needed to fund a large army and a bloated bureaucracy.
Who conquered constinteneople?
Constantinople was conquered by the Ottomans in 1453. It marked the fall of the Roman Empire, with the loss of the 'Second Rome'.
How are the Roman and Byzantine Empires alike?
During the latter part of the history of the Roman Empire, it was divided for administrative purposes into eastern and western halves. The western half was overrun by the Goths in the 5th century, but the eastern half continued to exist until the Turks finally conquered it in the 15th century. The eastern half of the Roman Empire evolved into what we call the Byzantine Empire, inheriting all the Roman Empire's practices and customs. The main change was that Greek (replacing Latin) gradually became the official langauge. So, the Byzantine Empire is the continuation of the eastern half of the Roman Empire.
Types of discipline?
Spanking,Grounding,Time-out,Loss of privlage
Why the deline in population was so harmful to the roman empire?
The decline in population was harmful to the Roman Empire because it led to a decrease in available labor, which impacted the agricultural and economic productivity of the empire. The loss of population also weakened the military strength of the empire, making it vulnerable to external threats. Additionally, with fewer people to pay taxes, the empire struggled to fund its administration and defense.
What were the causes of decline of loyalty and discipline in military that led to the fall of roman empire?
The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was precipitated by the invasions of this part of the empire by the Germanic peoples, rather than citizens indifference and loss of patriotism. It was said that many citizens were indifferent to these invasions because they were not worse than the Roman government. This attitude was due to resentment towards the oppressive taxation regime which the Roman state needed to fund a large army and a bloated bureaucracy.
