Firstly, NASA does not discover stars. That is done by Astronomers in various Universities working in Astronomical Observatories. Secondly, there are a lot of stars, so we see new stars and galaxies a lot, so discovering a new star is pretty common. New stars may even be discovered everyday.
It is the last frontier ( Star Trek) and there are things, planets, and maybe new civilizations to discover.
yes there is many stars and they can be discovered
just put it on you tube ,then people will discover you then you might have a chance to be on the news to be a new star
No, NASA has done its part, NASA's Apollo program has put a man on the moon, the space shuttle has delivered important people and supplies to the space station. The 17.6 Billion NASA gets per year could be used to make tax cuts and be given as grants to private space industries. I'm not against NASA i mean we would be no where without NASA but i think its time for them to go. The private space companies are a branch off of NASA think of the private industries as kids of NASA and NASA is getting old so they should fade away and let their "kids" continue their legacy. In conclusion NASA should let the private companies discover new tech and more efficient tech, and i think that NASA should fade back in after that, to cut cost by letting the private companies do the research.
NASA has launched the Kepler mission to search for new planets.
He got the most votes, but NASA are like oh well we;ll have to think about it or something, I don't know why they just don't put it on so yaa
yea
what i think is birds
because he liked to discover new things and introduce them to the world.
im not sure but i think it was because he loved to discover new things
No. But you are probably thinking of Ashley Judd who appeared in the episode where she and Westley Crusher discover that there is something strange about those addictive games from Riza (sp?).
James Cook did not discover New Guinea.