when displaying very small fractional or decimal values
a bar graph is better then a picograph because u can see a bar graph better then a pictograph.well some times people think that a pictograph is better but it is not better then a bar graph.well what i say is that a bar graph is better.
a bar graph can be better than a pictograph depending on the type of learner you are. for example, if you are a learner who responds to colourful or intresting stimulants a pictograph would be better. on the other hand if you are a person that responds to or better understands things in practical straight lines a bar graph would suit you more.
when it's a better looking picture!!!
Bar Graph is used more and it's much simpler too so that depends simple or artist?
it isn't a better choice. and u spelled better like beer
Because a bar graph and pictographs are more visual and labelled than any other type of graph.
no a double bar graph is better
better graph would be a line graph
Choice is better than select
when displaying very small fractional or decimal values Very small fractional or decimal values may appear unclear on pictographs. For example, it may be difficult to represent a value such as 0.018 or 1/16 using a picture of an object. In a bar graph, however, the intervals can be chosen so that very small values are more clear. Also, tick marks and grid lines can be added to a bar graph to make it easier read such values.
Technically, neither are better. However, if you are measuring time (example: stocks for a certain company for six months) then a line graph would be better.
Pie graphs are better for percentages rather than a bar graph. Bar graphs are better for showing amounts. Less than half Also, pie tastes so much better than a bar. if u no what i mean