when displaying very small fractional or decimal values
a bar graph is better then a picograph because u can see a bar graph better then a pictograph.well some times people think that a pictograph is better but it is not better then a bar graph.well what i say is that a bar graph is better.
a bar graph can be better than a pictograph depending on the type of learner you are. for example, if you are a learner who responds to colourful or intresting stimulants a pictograph would be better. on the other hand if you are a person that responds to or better understands things in practical straight lines a bar graph would suit you more.
when it's a better looking picture!!!
Bar Graph is used more and it's much simpler too so that depends simple or artist?
it isn't a better choice. and u spelled better like beer
Because a bar graph and pictographs are more visual and labelled than any other type of graph.
no a double bar graph is better
better graph would be a line graph
when displaying very small fractional or decimal values Very small fractional or decimal values may appear unclear on pictographs. For example, it may be difficult to represent a value such as 0.018 or 1/16 using a picture of an object. In a bar graph, however, the intervals can be chosen so that very small values are more clear. Also, tick marks and grid lines can be added to a bar graph to make it easier read such values.
Choice is better than select
Technically, neither are better. However, if you are measuring time (example: stocks for a certain company for six months) then a line graph would be better.
Pie graphs are better for percentages rather than a bar graph. Bar graphs are better for showing amounts. Less than half Also, pie tastes so much better than a bar. if u no what i mean