When there is nothing more to add
who is qualified to critique art when is a work of art truly finished
finished at last A+
Kazimir Malevich
Whenever the artist no longer has anything they wish to do with the work, like when they reach what they were going for
A Plenary painting is a painting that is totally complete. It is considered a full, complete, finished work of art.
A truly abstract work of art is derived from an actual object or things in the real world, something found in nature that the artist has 'abstracted'. A non objective work of art has no ties to any real world objects or things and so it is not an abstraction of anything, it is aptly named, non objective.
art is jugged by yourself not someone else so it is done when you want it done
This question is still argued today. Most people agree that a truly great work of art stands the test of time. Therefore, a person can not know what work done during one's lifetime will become great. There are exceptions, of course. Many people agree that Michael Jackson was a genius, his work was done for entertainment, but it also has qualities of great art. These qualities can be seen and felt in his work, and so it is great, ultimately time will tell .
Well, first you most Erh Erh Erh Eirrirrr !! !! Then you can truly understand art.
[Debit] Finished Goods [Credit] Work in process
Art that does not create emotions and feelings, you need to express your feelings through art thats what its for, you need to truly feel what your painting, drawing, ect.
Pictures are a work of art. Some people are really into art.