if the accountable officer obtained an advance decision from the proper authority and the improper payment was made in reliance on that advanced decision, or if he's a DoD Departmental Accountable Official and there was no fault or negligence
Justices Ginsburg and Breyer agreed that a company should be liable for the illegal use of its technology in the Grokster case. The company is only liable if it actively promotes the illegal uses of its technology.
The punishment is the removal from office, disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the united states, the party shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgement and punishment, according to law.
Impressment, colloquially, "the Press", refers to the act of taking men into a navy by force and without notice. It was used by the Royal Navy, beginning in 1664 and during the 18th and early 19th centuries, in wartime, as a means of crewing warships, although legal sanction for the practice goes back to the time of Edward I of England. The Royal Navy impressed many merchant sailors, as well as some sailors from other nations. People liable to impressment were eligible men of seafaring habits between the ages of 18 and 45 years.Non-seamen were impressed as well, though rarely.Wiki
Yes, he can if he has been impeached and convicted for committing a criminal act. The Constitution in Article 1, Section 3 states that the judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold any other office of honor trust or profit under the United States. It then provides that the party convicted of the impeachable acts shall be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment according to law. This means that even if the Senate convicts a President of treason, the only effect is removal from office. The actual criminal trial would have to take place in the criminal courts. Ironically, it is possible for a President to be convicted and removed by the Senate for a crime and then the same president found innocent in the criminal court on the same charges.
The senate was the advisory body of the consuls. It debated policy matters and issued recommendations on these. It also provided advice on the drafting of bills. In special circumstances it could issue decrees. It was composed of patricians (aristocrats) and former officers of state. It stood for the interests of the aristocracy. The Centuriate Assembly was the Assembly of the Soldiers. It elected the higher officers of state (the consuls, praetors and censors), voted on war and peace and on bills proposed by the consuls. The Plebeian Councils was the assembly of the plebs, the commoners. It elected the representatives of the plebeians, the plebeian tribunes, and voted on bills proposed by these tribunes. It was liable to clash with the senate because it represented the interests of the poor.
if the accountable officer obtained an advance decision from the proper authority and the improper payment was made in reliance on that advanced decision, or if he's a DoD Departmental Accountable Official and there was no fault or negligence
If the offense cost money, the officer responsible is pecuniarily liable.
Yes
Yes
Yes
They are pecuniarily liable for all illegal, improper or incorrect payments
They bear no presumption of negligence and are only liable for the dollar value of the erroneous payment that is attributable to their actions.
Yes, accountable officials can be held pecuniary liable for illegal, improper, or incorrect payments that occur as a result of negligence in performing their duties. They have a responsibility to ensure that payments are made in accordance with the law and regulations, and any failures to do so may result in financial penalties or other legal consequences.
A Certifying Officer's maximum level of pecuniary liability for erroneous payments is typically limited to the amount of the payment made. They could be held personally liable for the amount if they knowingly or negligently authorized a payment that was improper or not supported by adequate documentation.
They bear no presumption of negligence and are only liable for the dollar value of the erroneous payment that is attributable to their actions.
True
accountable, responsible, answerable