answersLogoWhite

0


Verified answer

When you want to know ancestral relationships.

When you are analyzing DNA of organisms

When you want to determine the order of evolution.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Jeremy Barberio

Lvl 1
2y ago
When you want to know ancestral relationships is the answer
User Avatar

SKA_SHADOW

Lvl 1
11mo ago
When you want to determine the order of evol
More answers
User Avatar

Marianne Hagenes

Lvl 10
2y ago

When you want to determine the order of evolution :: apex

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Cladistics is more useful than Linnaean taxonomy in most cases now. Before Cladistics, the Linnaean system was used, but has proven to be paraphyletic in many cases. This means that a lineage does not include a species' most recent common ancestor and logically doesn't make sense. Today, most biologists, zoologists and the like use Cladistics because it has more scientific support. The Linnaean system is a relic of the past now.

This answer is:
User Avatar
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Zoology

Why is the description of synapomorphies important in the work of systematics?

The description of synapomorphies (A derived trait shared by two or more species that is believed to reflect their shared ancestry) is important in the work of systematics (taxonomy) because then the systematists can know how the two or more species is related.


How many lions were there a long time ago?

13.7 billion years ago there were none. Protip: be more specific when asking questions, and you'll get answers that are more useful.


How is evolutionary classification different from linnaeus way of classifying?

Back when classification was still in its early times, people would arbitrarily choose a certain characteristic on an organism and classify them according to that. This was called artificial classification, as it just relied on external characteristics. For example, Linnaeus's famous system of classification used the sexual organs or plants to classify them, ie, whichever plants had the same looking organs were classified together. Today, the evolutionary classification is more true, in the sense that organisms are actually classified by their evolutionary relationships, and are thus actually related and similar.


Who is more useful between a dog and a cat?

It depends on what your definition of "useful" is. If you want something that catches mice and will sit in your lap, a cat may be more "useful". On the other hand, a Yorkie will also go after mice and sit in your lap. Cats do not need walks. It all depends on what you need. There is a breed of dog for almost anything you would like to do or any quality you like in companion. Sled dogs, running dogs, vermin dogs(terriers), lap dogs, sport dogs, etc.


What is the Latin name for a bumble bee?

Latin for wasp is vespa. If you are looking for the taxonomy, it depends on the type of wasp -- and there are a lot of them. However, they are all in the order Hymenoptera. The social wasps are in the family Vespidae; ichneumon wasps are in the family Ichneumonidae; chalcid wasps are in the family Chalcidoidae... There are more.

Related questions

When is cladistics more useful than Linnaean taxnomy a dsfadfasdf?

When you want to determine the order of evolution


In taxonomy which is more specific in taxonomy domain or species?

Species is more specific .


What is Linnaean's system of classification?

Linnaeus classified species by giving them two-part names (binomial nomenclature). The first part was the genus and the second a more specific name. This system is still used today, although we now automatically associate taxonomy (biological classification) with evolution.


How can convergent evolution mislead taxonomists?

Classically, taxonomy bases its classifications on morphological characteristics of organisms. However, convergent evolution sometimes produces very similar morphological characteristics independently in sibling branches, leading an unsuspecting taxonomist that the organisms in question are more closely related than they actually are. Since some time, cladistics has become the standard for locating organisms in the tree of life. Cladistics combines assays in comparative morphology with assays in comparative genomics to more accurately place a species. Cladistics does not structure its tree according to a predefined set of ranks (ie. families, classes, orders, etc), but defines a clade simply in terms of an ancestral form and all its descendants.


What is the system of classification for plants and animals called?

Species are traditionally given a two part Latin name, this is consistent with Linnaean taxonomy. Organisms are allocated to Genera, Families, Orders, Classes, Plyla and Kingdoms.Linnaean taxonomy relies heavily on morphology to associate and classify organisms - i.e. if it looks like a wasp and it flies like a wasp and it sounds like a wasp then... oh actually sometimes it's a hover fly.The system was developed before biologists found evidence for convergent evolution - hover flies evolving to look like wasps is an example of Batesian mimicry.Extra CreditThis works fine for complex plants and animals, but isn't so effective when classifying micro-organisms, phylogenetics which classifies organisms by their relatedness is probably more useful - the concept of a species tends to breakdown when considering bacteria.


Compare cladistic taxonomy with more traditional taxonomy?

Cladistic taxonomy is based on the evolutionary history of groups of organisms rather than using structural similarities like traditional taxonomy does.


What is the naming system called?

Binomial nomenclature. In instances in which more than Genus species is necessary to accurately name an organism, the system is sometimes dubbed "Trinomial nomenclature," or even "Quadrunomial nomenclature." However, the textbook answer is Binomial nomenclature.


What is Linnaeus system of classification?

Linnaean taxonomy is a system of classification that divides all living things into hierarchical groups based on their characteristics. (i.e Living things are divided into groups, the groups are then divided into smaller groups and so on until every living thing has a distinct name due to their distinct characteristics.) The Linnaean taxonomy hierarchy from top to bottom: 1. domain 2. kingdom 3. phylum 4. class 5. order 6. family 7. genus 8. species 9. subspecies (occasionally used) Why is so much of it still in use? The system has been continuously refined over the years with different groups being added when a new discovery is made. Linnaean taxonomy is still in use because the hierarchical system is very efficient in presenting information. For example, the Linnaean classification of humans gives much information about our characteristics: Domain: Eukaryota We are eukaryotes, which means we belong to organisms that are composed of more than one cell. (unlike prokaryotes) Family: Animalia We are animals (as opposed to plants and fungi eukaryotes), which means we have practically all animal features. Phylum: Chordata We are vertebrates, which means we have a spine. (Unlike jellyfish and such) Class: Mammalia We have mammalian features, which included being warm blooded, giving live births and feeding on milk. Order: Primates We have primate features, five fingers, non-specific teeth, binocular vision etc. Family: Hominidae Hominid features: no tail, omnivorous diet, nails instead of claws etc. Genus: Homo We are the only modern species of the genus homo. Features include bipedalism. Other living things may have several species within the same genus. Species: Homo sapiens The unique name given to our species with all the features of the above hierarchy. Subspecies: Homo sapiens sapiens Some classify modern humans as this subspecies due to differing classifications of other (extinct) species of the genus homo. Due to efficient manner the information of living organisms is presented, the Linnaean taxonomy will continue to be used.


What is The science of classification is called?

Type your answer here... Systematique ...in french. In fact Taxonomy is more oriented on descriptive and classification aspects as systématique focuses on inter-relations and how taxons are organized in evolution


What is one of todays taxonomy needs?

There are a great many different needs of today's taxonomy. Many taxonomy experts are identify certain species or organisms as specifically one thing or another.


How did DNA technology lead more use of cladistics?

It showed that gene flow different-looking animals are actually related


What is another word for sitemap?

Site Schema and Site Taxonomy are both used in the place of 'site map' - site taxonomy is technically more accurate.