When you want to determine the order of evolution
Phylogeny is the most useful in understanding how an organism developed into its current form because it focuses on the evolutionary history and relationships between different species. By analyzing phylogenetic trees and genetic data, scientists can trace the evolutionary pathways of organisms and determine their common ancestry. Cladistics, on the other hand, is a method used within phylogenetics to classify organisms based on shared derived characteristics.
Yes and no. Primarily it is for figuring out evolutionary pathways...by grouping animals with similar traits into related families ("clades") it helps us to determine ancestry -- i.e. who evolved from whom...but because it deals with similarities and differences regarding traits, it can also be useful in determining speciation.
Tsunami is useful to generate electricity.
The Antarctic ozone hole is not useful. It was harmful.
The system of classification, such as the Linnaean taxonomy, is essential for organizing the immense diversity of life by providing a structured framework to categorize organisms based on shared characteristics. This system facilitates communication among scientists, aids in the identification of species, and enhances our understanding of evolutionary relationships. By grouping organisms into hierarchical categories, it allows researchers to study biodiversity more systematically and makes it easier to track ecological and evolutionary patterns. Overall, classification is a vital tool for biological research and conservation efforts.
Cladistics is more useful than Linnaean taxonomy when a biologist wants to understand evolutionary relationships and common ancestry among species. Cladistics uses shared derived characteristics to group organisms into clades, reflecting evolutionary history more accurately than the subjective criteria used in Linnaean taxonomy. However, Linnaean taxonomy is still commonly used for practical purposes such as species identification and classification.
When you want to know ancestral relationships. When you are analyzing DNA of organisms When you want to determine the order of evolution.
Cladistics is more useful than Linnaean taxonomy when studying evolutionary relationships because it groups organisms based on shared evolutionary history. This allows for a more accurate representation of evolutionary relationships compared to Linnaean taxonomy, which is based on physical characteristics.
Classics is more useful than Linnaean taxonomy in understanding the historical development of scientific classification systems, as it provides insight into the philosophical and practical considerations that shaped early taxonomic practices. Additionally, classics can offer a broader perspective on the cultural and intellectual contexts in which taxonomic ideas emerged.
Phylogeny is the most useful in understanding how an organism developed into its current form because it focuses on the evolutionary history and relationships between different species. By analyzing phylogenetic trees and genetic data, scientists can trace the evolutionary pathways of organisms and determine their common ancestry. Cladistics, on the other hand, is a method used within phylogenetics to classify organisms based on shared derived characteristics.
A useful characteristic to use in cladistics is a derived trait, or synapomorphy, which is a feature that is present in an organism but absent in its ancestors. This characteristic helps to establish evolutionary relationships among different groups by highlighting shared traits that indicate common ancestry. For example, the presence of feathers in birds is a synapomorphy that distinguishes them from their reptilian ancestors. Utilizing such traits allows scientists to construct more accurate phylogenetic trees and understand evolutionary lineages.
Yes and no. Primarily it is for figuring out evolutionary pathways...by grouping animals with similar traits into related families ("clades") it helps us to determine ancestry -- i.e. who evolved from whom...but because it deals with similarities and differences regarding traits, it can also be useful in determining speciation.
Most useful and more useful.
more useful, the most useful
The comparative form of "useful" is "more useful."
more useful, most useful
Computers are so useful to us.Bert is not a very useful person.I find that the phone is a useful invention.Make yourself useful and pass me the spanner.Hopefully these sentences are useful to you.