When it is used as "fair compensation" for a large number of proven murders or equal crimes.
One punishment that is highly debated in regards to cruel and unusual punishment is the death penalty. It's very uncommon for the actual death sentence to be brought out.
no, it someone done something to get them in that situation
No amendment "challenges" the death penalty. The 8th Amendment has been used as a legal basis for challenging the constitutionality of the death penalty. The argument is that the 8th Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment" and that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore is prohibited by the US Constitution. This argument was successful in earlier cases, not because the death penalty itself was cruel and unusual but because of the way it was administered. The death penalty is allowed if it is administered without racial or ethnic bias and in a non-cruel manner.
The death penalty for very serious crimes is cruel and unusual.
no because it's dignified. Cruel and unusual punishment is like torture or being starved or stuff that go against human morals. most of the people on death row are there BECAUSE they acted cruel and unusually.
Most likely on the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
The death penalty is legal in the US because the US Supreme Court ruled that it is not cruel or unusual punishment, and the Federal and some state legislatures have not seen fit to repeal it.
Yes, in 1972, the case of Furman v Georgia made the death penalty unconstitutional. By a vote of 5 to 4 the Supreme Court found the death penalty cruel and unusual as practiced. They said it was arbitrary and capricious in the way it was administered. Justices Marshall and Brennan found the death penalty cruel and unusual per se. Justice Douglas, Justice Stewart, and Justice White found capital punishment cruel and unusual as practiced. In 1976 Gregg v. Georgia brought back the death penalty.
it is used as fair compensation for a proven collection of murders or equal crime.
The American Constitution doesn't prevent the Death Penalty, which is not the same as supporting.Another View: The US Constitution does not address Capital Punishment anywhere in the document. The only restriction on any type of punishment that is addressed in the Constitution is a prohibition agaionst "cruel and unusual punishment."
they think is cruel and unusual punishment.
This would be considered an extreme form of torture and a violation of human rights. It is unethical and inhumane to intentionally deprive someone of food and water to the point of death.