0
What else can I help you with?
Is evidence to support the idea that two different species might have a common ancestor?
Yes, evidence supporting the common ancestry between two different species includes similarities in genetic sequences, anatomical structures, and developmental patterns. Additionally, the fossil record often reveals transitional forms that link different species together. Overall, these lines of evidence strongly support the theory of evolution and common ancestry among living organisms.
What are the evidence of evolution?
New since when? The answer may include anything from new palaeontological evidence (eg. fossils and such) to new geophysical findings to the advent of genetics and new findings in the fields of genetics and genomics to the latest findings based on the mathematical modelling of population dynamics and population genetics, and so forth, and so on. Perhaps a more specific question might help.
Describe how DNA evidence might be used to confirm scientists' conclusions about any relationship between birds and seals?
DNA evidence can be used to compare the genetic similarities and differences between birds and seals, providing insight into their evolutionary relationship. By analyzing the genetic material of both species, scientists can confirm or refute their conclusions about the evolutionary relationship between birds and seals, based on the presence of shared or distinct genetic markers. This molecular evidence can offer a reliable way to support or challenge existing theories about the evolutionary history of birds and seals.
Which evidence supports the idea that two different species might have a common ancestor?
One piece of evidence is the presence of homologous structures in both species, which suggests a shared evolutionary history. Another indication is the presence of similar genetic sequences or biochemical pathways in the two species. Additionally, the fossil record may reveal transitional forms that bridge the gap between the two species.
Why do scientists call evolution a theory?
Because it cannot be proven or replicated.AnswerIn science, a hypothesis is a good idea, a possible explanation, which might be right and might be wrong. Hypotheses can be refuted by experimentation. If the expectation from the hypothesis is not met by the outcome of experiment, the hypothesis is refuted. The longer a hypothesis survives unrefuted the more confidence we have in it. Evidence can support a hypothesis. The more evidence one has in support of a hypothesis, the more grows our confidence in it. Within the philosophy of science of Karl Popper, a hypothesis cannot be proven, but one can have a mighty amount of confidence in one, proportional to the amount of evidence in support of it. Unrefuted and with backing evidence, a hypothesis is promoted to a theory! A theory is better than a hypothesis. Evolution has much evidence from comparative genetics, comparative morphology and the fossil record. Evolution was once a hypothesis. Darwin collected a large mass of evidence for On the Origin of Species and now we have evidence from Mendelian genetics and comparative genetics, which Darwin knew nothing of. We now have a greater fossil record than Darwin did. There is far more evidence these days (for what is now called Neodarwinism or the Modern Synthesis- the combination of genetics and Darwin's basic 1859 ideas) than there was in Darwin's time. Evolution now has so much evidence that it is best to call it a theory, rather than a hypothesis. Yes, theories are unproven, but in Popperian philosophy of science they cannot be proven. Theories survive refutation and have much evidence and explain a lot. Biology regards evolution as its baseline, its most important idea ever. It might only be a theory of which we can only be 99% confident, but it explains everything so well that most biologists should better call it a fact rather than a theory. Evolution is such a good theory that its pedantic differentiation from 'fact' is entirely unnecessary.
What extra evidence might you need to collect before coming to a conculusion?
shut up ok......
Does igor Russian machofucker have aids?
I recently spotted in a video a new biohazard tattoo on his arm, which might indicate that he does, in fact, have HIV
Are you required to register if you retired from the military?
It is necessary that we know what you might register for after retirement. If you want to collect VA benefits, you'll have to file for them. Other than that, there really isn't anything to "register" for.
Why might Frontinus' and Juvenal's evidence on aqueducts be unreliable?
The evidence might be unreliable because technology and other knowledge has advanced since that time, and their evidence might have been biased.
What is the Forensic police?
Forensic criminalists are people employed by Police Departments to collect, identify, and report on evidence at crime scenes. They may be sworn police officers or civilian employees. They are patient and methodical in collecting evidence which might show how a crime was committed and by whom. They testify in criminal and civil court cases about how they identified, collected, and tested the evidence they found.
Can an illegal immigrant collect lottery winnings in Louisiana?
Might not allow you to collect it because your in the country illegally which is a crime in itself...
What is evidence how is direct evidence different from inderict evidence?
Direct evidence are visible noticable changes. Indirect evidence is when you might not see the action happen but you do notice the results
What question might you answer during analysis?
What evidence is there?
How do you find evidence that might be left at the crime scene?
Evidence at a crime scene can be found through systematic search methods, such as grid, spiral, or strip search patterns. Investigators use tools like cameras, collection kits, and protective gear to gather physical evidence like DNA, fingerprints, fibers, or weapons. They also document observations, take photographs, and collect samples meticulously to preserve the integrity of the evidence.
Why ovefishing is necessary?
Though some might say it is necessary to feed the population of the world, overfishing is not necessary.
What should not go in a biohazard bag?
Items which are of a regular, everyday trash or recycling nature (i.e. things which you would dispose of in other more normal ways) which are NOT contaminated by some biological should not be placed in a biohazard bag. Also, sharp items which might puncture the bag - specifically, those items known as "sharps" (needles, etc.) - have specific hard-shell containers for disposal. Those items which are radiologically contaminated, or of very high biological contamination (requiring BL3 or BL4 containment protocols) should be put in their own specially-designed containers, not the standard biohazard bag.
Can the law take your cellphone?
Yes, there might be evidence in it.
