0
Describe how DNA evidence might be used to confirm scientists' conclusions about any relationship between birds and seals?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
DNA evidence might be used to confirm scientists' conclusions about any relationships between any animal and how closely related they are.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do scientists use fossil evidence to prove?
Evolution
How do scientists use similarities in early development as evidence for evolution?
By examining fossils and by determining their relative and absolute ages, scientists have collected evidence that supports the theory that species changed over time.
Describe how eukaryotes evolved?
Although there is no fossil evidence for the evolution of eukaryotes from prokaryotes, scientists have inferred this through studying modern organisms. Scientists believe that eukaryotes evolved from prokaryotes because both have RNA and DNA as genetic material, contain ribosomes, and also utilize the identical 20 amino acids.
Scientists determine evolutionary relationships between animal phyla using evidence from the?
Fossil record
Why do scientists study proteins to find evidence for evolution?
Proteins reflect DNA sequences, so scientists study proteins to look for genetic similarities and differences in organisms.
Why is it important that scientists conclusions are based on evidence?
They rely on there conclusions based on observations.
Why do scientists record details about scientific observations?
to provide evidence that supports conclusions.
How DNA evidence might be used to confirm scientists conclusions about any relationships between birds and seals?
DNA evidence might be used to confirm scientists' conclusions about any relationships between any animal and how closely related they are.
Scientists use to organize questions and reach conclusions that are backed by scientific evidence and research?
the Scientific Method
Why are scientists realists?
Scientists are realists because most of the conclusions that they arrive at is as a result of an experiment. They try to offer explanation on the various events based on evidence other than imaginations.
How are scientific evidence and scientific conclusions related?
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
What should you do if you you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?
If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.
What should you do if you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question?
If you find evidence that supports opposing conclusions based on your research question, weigh the evidence for both conclusions and pick the one you think is most convincing.
A science researcher is reviewing another scientists experiment and conclusion. the reviewer would most likely consider the experiment invalid if?
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
When you reach conclusions based on evidence?
When reaching conclusions based on evidence, it is important to consider the reliability and quality of the evidence, as well as any potential biases that may be present. It is also crucial to follow a systematic and logical process of analysis to ensure that the conclusions are well-founded and supported by the evidence. Communication of the conclusions should be clear and transparent, highlighting the key findings and the reasoning behind them.
How do scientists get empirical evidence?
i know that this is stupid but how do scientists get empirical evidence.
What should you do if in the process of gathering information about a research question you find evidence that supports two opposing conclusions?
Weigh the evidence for both conclusions and decide which has the most merit
