Sometimes, but not necessarily always.
Co-defendants can be sentenced differently. They do not have to all be found guilty or not guilty.
One Senator was impeached and found guilty, three Federal Judges were impeached and two were found guilty, one supreme court justice found not guilty and one President found not guilty.
A person is never found innocent. A person is found guilty or not guilty at the verdict phase of a criminal trial.
The OJ Simpson pog that says on one side not guilty and on the other side guilty is more than $50000. Where can we sell it ?
One perspective: Jesus was found guilty because he HAD to be found guilty. From the point of view of his accusers and judges, he WAS guilty. This is coming from the perspective of salvation history. The entire point of his life was his ultimate sacrifice on behalf of mankind. If he had not been found guilty, then what? His death was completely in keeping with the plan of salvation and his life could not possibly have turned out any differently.
Assuming you're asking about Chase's impeachment trial in the Senate, he was found not guilty (no one is ever found innocent) of the charges against him in 1805.
John Wilkes Booth was the one who was found guilty.
absolutetly YES!
In court trials, the two outcomes are either "guilty" or "not guilty". Therefore, any one who is not found to be guilty is declared to be not guilty and will be free to leave the court. There is not verdict of "innocent" in virtually any court in the world.
The price of an official licensed pog with OJ Simpson on one side that says guilty and the other side says not guilty is more than $50000.
In a civilised country the basic rule of law is that "one is presumed to be innocent - until found guilty." One is not "found" innocent therefore.
The word "innocent" means the same as "not guilty". But nowhere apart from Scotland is anyone "found innocent". That is because in all common law systems, accused persons are presumed innocent unless proven to be guilty. If there is not enough proof that the person is guilty, he is found to be "not guilty" even though there is no proof of his innocence. The OJ Simpson case is a case in point. One court found that there was more evidence of his guilt than there was of his innocence, but another court found that there was not enough evidence of his guilt to find that he was proven guilty of the crime. He was therefore found not guilty although no court would find him innocent.