If you mean smelt as in the past tense and past participle of smell, then:
use the past - smelt when talking about something that happened in the past and is now finished eg The dog smelt the smoke and began barking.
use the past participle - smelt when:
using present perfect - I have smelt that smell before somewhere.
using past perfect - The lions had smelt the smoke and were now agitated.
You should use "smelt" when you want to convey the process of extracting metal from its ore through heating and melting. It can also refer to the act of perceiving or discerning something.
No, "smelt" is not the past tense of "smell." "Smelt" can refer to a type of small fish or a process of extracting metal from its ore. The past tense of "smell" is "smelled" or "smelt" (mainly in British English).
The past participle of "smell" is "smelled" in American English and "smelt" in British English.
She picked fresh lavender from her garden to use in the homemade soap she was making.
The past tense of smell is smelled. Smelt is also acceptable.
You should use "they do" with plural subjects, such as "they do their homework," and "does" with singular subjects, like "she does her chores."
In the United States, from a couple of different websites that I found, you should say "smelled," and not "smelt." Smelt is interchangeable with smelled in the UK, though, and is common over there. Smelt is also a type of fish.
A smelt is a fish, and roe is fish eggs, so smelt roe is smelt eggs.
The putrid compost smelt horrible.
I smelt you. Then I smelt the air. they are not the same.
No, smelled is but not smelt
smelt verb = smell past = smelt past participle = smelt
Dennis Smelt was born in 1750.
Lee Smelt was born in 1958.
European smelt was created in 1758.
The fetid bog smelt of rancid milk and rotten eggs.
I think a smelt's a fish, so yes.
Cornelius Smelt was born in 1748-08.