This is an example of a predator prey relationship. They depend on each other. Without one, both one die. If the Zebra population decreases, then the lion population will decrease a bit, but not much because there are other animals for lions to eat.
Think of this as a math problem. The population of zebras goes down. Zebras are one of the primary foods for lions. Less food mean less lions and less lions means they have less cubs. Therefore the population goes down. Some will also die due to not finding food and the sick lions will die out not getting replaced by new births.
because zebras are cooler! no der...
Generally, predators are less populated than their prey. Zebras are herbivores, meaning the grass of the African plains will always be there for them to eat. Lions, on the other hand, have to deal with the fluctuating population of the zebras and other animals for their food.
To explain the main idea in fewer words.
To explain the main idea in fewer words.
To explain the main idea in fewer words.
The social trend of the vast majority of wealth being held by fewer and fewer people has resulted in a reduction in the % of the population able to buy moderate to high priced goods. This hurts the vendors and producers of many goods.
The social trend of the vast majority of wealth being held by fewer and fewer people has resulted in a reduction in the % of the population able to buy moderate to high priced goods. This hurts the vendors and producers of many goods.
a larger population would feed on the fewer population because the population is small and it is less likely for them to defend themselves. and pretty soon when both populations aren't balanced out the bigger population overtakes the fewer population and leads to extinction
the population is unknown
The fewer the trees (cut to make room for the houses), the fewer the bugs, the fewer the woodpeckers.
Only those that affect elephants (these are far fewer than those that affect humans).
There will be fewer frogs maturing from the remaining population.