This isn't AS straight-forward as it sounds!
Complicating matters is how much traffic is behind the first ascending or descending vehicle! It can be nightmarish to get all drivers to understand and coordinate the intended actions. Among local drivers traveling known one-lane or narrow hills, a long line of drivers in both directions usually alternate--- one descends, next ascends, next descends--- BUT every driver must clearly indicate their knowledge that drivers are alternating who goes next. Never, ever assume.
In each of these situations, the type of vehicle (manual vs automatic), weight of vehicle (car vs single or multi-axle truck), width of vehicle (e.g. snow plow), and accompanying attachments on backs of vehicles (camper, trailer, semi) or on fronts of vehicles (snow plow), or a tow truck, all play into the decisions about WHO will back up. However, this decision needs to be made quickly so an ascending vehicle can continue to move smoothly up the grade; or the descending vehicle can slow, stop, reverse, and get out of the way.
Any way you cut it, one driver must forego right of way....and it might as well be 'you'. When you take the initiative to give over your right of way (or to acknowledge the other driver's right of way), you eliminate any possible confusion or competition about who gets half-way up or down the hill first. In the 1960s, the driver giving right of way to the other driver would rapidly flash his/her headlights several times after clearly pulling far right at the top or bottom to "wait", so the other driver would know the person was giving over right of way, or acknowledging "the other guy is supposed to go first".
My expertise: I grew up in the Appalachian Mountains where there are plenty of narrow or one lane roads on hills. Got to see outcomes of mis-communicating or sullen drivers, and how hard it can be to keep a manual stick vehicle going up when the other driver refused to back up. One hill had double sets of railroad tracks at the bottom of the hill, so I got educated about backing up to across the tracks to wait... even if it meant the B&O train would block our travel when it came through before a vehicle finished its descent on the hill. Knew well the difference that chains on tires made in snow/ice, and the scare of sliding on descent with no guard rails on the right (the cliff side) while trying to get a driver to NOT ascend until we cleared the descent. Whew.
the vehicle going uphill has the right of way
The vehicle facing downhill must back up until the other can pass. The downhill vehicle has greater control when backing up.
Depends upon the amount of distance each vechile has traveled. One would think there would be enough room for the eah vehicle to share the lane.
The car going UP-hill has the right-of-way
defending ahs to yield
The vehicle ascending.
The one
Going up?
Water flowing downhill across the surface of the Earth is called runoff.
No but that does not mean they won't do either. A repo man cannot legally move another vehicle out of the way, but if he can get the car just by driving across the grass, then legally he can and probably will do so.
Runoff is the water flowing downhill across the surface of the Earth.
the letter A
90 degree angle
A swerve should minimize the severity of the crash.
90 degree angle
90 degree angle
90 degree angle
Impossible to answer as it entirely depends on where your driving starting point is. You could be driving across town or driving a thousand miles.
Personally, I think that it should be the fault of the driver going across the aisle, but other may think otherwise.
If you take I-70 all the way across the state the driving distance is about 450 road miles.