Julius Caesar was apponted dictator four times: in 49 BC (he resigned after 11 days), in 48 BC (for an indeterminate period and he seems to have held it for one year), in 46 BC (for ten years) and in 44 BC (for life),
Julius was a dictator. Augustus was an emperor.
Of course. They could have let him carry on being the dictator for the rest of his life.
210.
The dictator of Rome was usually Caesar. There have been many Caesars over the course of many years, but when elected they took on the title of Caesar to be sort of like "king" or "emperor"
the last was election was in the 1960's voting Fidel Castro in as their president. Then it turned into a monarchy and he therefore he became the dictator
Caesar was appointed dictator three times during the civil war. The first time was to preside over his election as consul (one of the two annually elected heads of the republic) and he held it for 12 days, the second was for an indeterminate time and he held it for one year, and the third time for ten years. His allies, such as Lepidus and Mark Antony, also held consulships. After the civil war, Caesar was appointed dictator for life.
Well he was declared dictator, tried to dissolve the senate and eventually was murdered by a few senators including Brutus. So i would say they disliked him.
in different parts of his rising it was hard. in 1932 he lost the election as dictator.
by force
A dictator may run in a rigged election to legitimize their regime and create a façade of democratic governance. By participating in an election, they can claim a mandate from the people, bolstering their authority and deterring domestic and international criticism. Additionally, it serves to consolidate power and suppress dissent by giving the appearance of political participation, even if the outcome is predetermined.
The events leading to Caesar's death were the accumulation of power by Caesar. they stabbed him because they felt as dictator for life thAT he would abbuse his power or be too powerful
A dictator might run in a ragged election to create a facade of legitimacy and democratic participation while maintaining control over the political landscape. This can help to placate domestic and international criticism, as it gives the appearance of adhering to democratic norms. Additionally, a manipulated election can serve to consolidate power by eliminating genuine opposition and reinforcing the dictator's authority through a controlled outcome. Ultimately, it allows the regime to project an image of stability and support while suppressing dissent.