No, the frenulum has a lower chance of being torn if it is left intact after a circumcision if you think it can be torn regardless. The frenulum is the most erogenous zone of the male body, the removal of it is an abomination. If you remove the frenulum, you destroy the male's ability to have the amount of pleasure he would normally have.
Circumcision should be done only a as LAST RESORT. Circumcision in general reduces sensitivity and removes perfectly healthy tissue. If a male has phimosis, then other methods may be used, circumsision is not necessary. It violates human rights and mutilates the penis. It's just a no brainier: if you are pro-unnecessary circumcision, you are a psychopath.
there is no reason to have the foreskin removed. First of all there is no medical reason for it except under very rare circumstance's. The foreskin protect, improves and makes the penis a better unit from both a sexual and physical perspective. circumcision is a religious rite and has never been necessary for any practical or health purpose. Les the 20% of the worlds men have been subjected to this form of mutilation and most of these for religious or cultural reasons. It is interesting to note that the regions where this originated from also have millions of women with mutilated genitals.
sometimes, it all depends on how much damage the doctor decides to do
I would, because I would be afraid of the frenulum breaking and bleeding all over the place.
If you are refering to the foreskin, this is clearly genital mutilation and should be avoided.
No when they circumcise they remove the foreskin only. Not the penis.
Having more foreskin removed.
All boys have foreskins on their penises when they are born, but many have it removed when they are very small and don't ever remember having it. Often it is removed before the baby leaves the hospital after being born.
A circumcised penis has the foreskin removed. An uncircumcised one does not.
There is nothing medically wrong with foreskin. If you care to have it removed or it is causing you problems you should contact your Primary care physician who then can refer you to a Urologist. At that time you and your doctor may decide that circumcision is an option for you.
yes, you can get it removed. yes, it is safe (to an extent). yes, its expensive
An un-cut penis, is not having the foreskin on the penis removed either at birth or later in life. You're fine
the removal of a males foreskin on his penis
The best way to be circumcised is not to be circumcised at all. Circumcision has no known medical benefit and has the risks of potential complications and adverse events following the procedure. Circumcision also decreases the sensitivity of the penis, resulting in decreased pleasure during sexual intercourse. Circumcision is generally only used to treat cases of phimosis (tight foreskin) that do not respond to the usual treatment of gradual stretching exercises with the use of a topical corticosteroid cream. When circumcision is medically necessary because of a tight foreskin (phimosis), typically as little foreskin as possible should be removed. Typically only the tight phimotic ring will need to be removed, meaning that 2-3 cm of the foreskin will be removed. If you wish to be circumcised for cosmetic reasons, you may have as much or as little of the foreskin removed as you would like. I would recommend against having the frenulum removed, as this would only result in making sexual intercourse less pleasurable. Radical circumcision is not recommended. It can cause painful erections and painful intercourse. It also desensitizes the penis, making orgams more difficult to achieve and less pleasurable. The frenulum should generally not be removed during circumcision. Religious groups performing circumcision have their own standards and expectations from the procedure. Traditionally, circumcision within Judaism and Islam has involved removal of only a few centimeters of the foreskin. However, in the United States most circumcisions remove the entire foreskin, so that none of it remains to cover any part of the penis head.
The skin on the shaft of the penis extends over the head. All males are born with foreskin and for religious reasons or parents choice some are circumcised, the foreskin is removed.
The foreskin of an uncircumsized newborn should NEVER be pulled back; it is a myth and it is dangerous to do this. It should never be forced back by a parent, no matter what the reason the parent has. Keep your hands off of it. Tissues of the glans penis and of the covering foreskin are not yet differentiated, and the foreskin should be left alone. Some physicians consider that an unretracted foreskin can be normal and non-problematic even as late as puberty. Yes, there can be problems with the foreskin, but pathological phimosis (a medically problematic unretractable foreskin) is virtually NEVER a competent diagnosis at birth.AnswerThe foreskin does not retract at birth. Forcing it back at this age can cause tearing and scarring meaning it will be difficult to retract in the future.