The children of the rich had a tutor and they studied at home. Presumably they had lunch at home.
The children of humble background went to classes set up by teachers for fee. Rome did not have a state-run school system. These classes were run in whatever space the teachers could find: private homes, a gymnasium, at the back of a shop with a curtain for separation from the shop, or in the street. We do not know what the class hours were and therefore we do not know where the children had lunch. Lunch for the Romans was like a snack.
Poor families could not afford to send their children to classes. Education was not compulsory.
It depends on what you eat for a school lunch. If your lunch is packed yes if not then no. It can be healthy if you eat fruits and vegetables at school lunch.
its for school
School kids usually eat lunch at their homes in Switzerland.
Roman gods and citizens usually ate bread and milk for breakfast, something close to sandwiches for lunch, and meat and vegetables for dinner. Normal American meals are similar to Ancient Roman meals.
they should improve school lunch because it discusting which makes kids not wanna eat it
NOTHING DO DO lol but i did have a breto for lunch XD
tities
yes
they have; it is also permitted to leave school to have lunch at home if you are living next to the school. I go to a all French school & we have to eat a school but we are allowed to go home to eat but only if our parents come to get us
They alwways have lunch at canteen.Of course, pack an lunch is also promitted.
The Roman lunch was not a big meal and consisted of leftovers from the dinner of the previous day and occasionally included fish and fruit. Poor Romans eat bread or a kind of porrige in every meal.
It was his lunch money Posted by Jenna Sirucek