There is no rational justification for Holocaust denial.
No.There is a lot of misunderstanding about laws against Holocaust denial. In countries that have such laws (for example, Germany) there is no requirement for "believing in the Holocaust". The prohibition or ban is on publicly denying it. The laws do not say "Thou shalt believe in the Holocaust".Nevertheless, this is a restriction on freedom of speech ...Incidentally, contrary to a widespread misconception, Britain has no law against Holocaust denial.
Deborah Lipstadt and Richard J. Evans, among others, have written about (and against) Holocaust denial.
In the vast majority of countries, including the US and UK, there is no law against Holocaust denial. In Germany, Austria and some other countries, public denial of the Holocaust is banned on the grounds that it is tantamount to an attempt to rehabilitate the Nazis (with a view to restoring them) and on the grounds that it is a form of Jew-baiting. Please see the link.
It is only "denial" of the Holocaust that is illegal in some countries. The Holocaust is the name used for the Nazi genocide against the Jews during World War II. After the war, Germany, Austria and other countries passed laws that prohibited the public denial of the Holocaust as an historical fact. The intent of these laws is to prevent the same sort of ethnic or racial hatred to occur again in these countries, more specifically to prevent the rehabilitation of the Nazi movement by denying that they did anything immoral when they performed abhorrent and brutal acts against innocent people. It was a well-documented official program. In a practical sense, it also deters Germany from falling under the control of any similar mass nationalistic movement by remembering the terrible effects it had on the perpetrators as well as the victims.
Holocaust denial is most active in United States, because of freedom of speech (First Amendment) Despite what people may think, Holocaust denial and swastikas are illegal in Germany and those who disobey this law are often fined and temporarily imprisoned.
Denial - outright rejection. --- Note that denial is also used in the sense of dogmatic refusal to believe (something). Well known examples include Holocaust denial and climate change denial.
unquestionably!
America fought Germany for the end of the Holocaust, you can learn more if you research more about the Holocaust end and WW2.
While the key reasons for Holocaust denial are varied, the three main reasons given stem from (1) a desire to rehabilitate the Nazis, (2) antisemitism, or (3) the belief that facts surrounding the Holocaust have been fabricated or drastically exaggerated.Also, to be clear, Holocaust denial is a politically-motivated viewpoint; it is not an academic historical subject. That is, Holocaust denial is not a valid "alternate" interpretation of history, and has no place in historical studies. Historians reject the "study" of Holocaust denial as invalid (in the same way that they reject the "study" of dinosaurs living side-by-side with humans, in that neither has any basis in fact).Holocaust denial is rooted in certain beliefs which are political in nature - that is, Holocaust denial is a socio-political phenomena, and as such part of sociology and political science, NOT history. The distinction is important, as history deals with the interpretation of established factual events, while sociology and political science deal with human ideas and psychology of large groups, and are not concerned with the veracity of those idea's underlying assumptions.
Yes it is, as well as 12 other countries. (Note that this relates to public denial).
Holocaust denial began while it was happening, early 40s. The Allies did not believe it until they saw it for themselves. Knowing future generations would be in doubt, they tried to film and document as much as possible.