Yes, near the end of the play Macbeth becomes king of Scotland. Actually, he becomes king rather early in the play, between Act 2 and Act 3.
In Shakespeare's "Macbeth," several major events unfold: Macbeth's encounter with the three witches occurs early in the play, igniting his ambition. Shortly after, he murders King Duncan to seize the throne, an act that takes place in Act 2. Following this, Macbeth's reign leads to further violence, including the murder of Banquo and the attempted killing of Fleance, which occur in Act 3. Ultimately, Macbeth's tyranny results in his downfall and death at the hands of Macduff, culminating in Act 5.
In Act 2 Scene 1 of the Shakespearean play 'Macbeth', Banquo and his son Fleance met in the court of Macbeth's castle at Inverness. Banquo explained that he had been unable to sleep. He said that 'cursed thoughts' [Line 8] were keeping him awake. Most likely, he was referring to the witches' predictions of his fathering a long line of kings of Scotland, in Act 1 Scene 2.
Yes, the King's death took place before Banquo's did. In Act 2 Scene 2 of the Shakespearean play, Macbeth [c. 1014-August 15, 1057] stabbed King Duncan I [d. August 14, 1040] and his two royal guards to death. In Act 3 Scene 3, the three murderous thugs carried out Macbeth's orders to slit Banquo's throat.
No, Macduff wasn't killed. But his entire family and household were stabbed to death, in Act 4 Scene 2. The Fife Castle massacre of the Macduffs and everyone connected to them was arranged by Macbeth [c. 1014-August 15, 1057]. So Macduff bided his time for revenge. The opportunity came in Act 5 Scene 8, when he and Macbeth found themselves on the same part of the battlefield near Dunsinane Castle. Macduff killed and beheaded his opponent.
Macduff refuses to attend Macbeth's coronation.
Macduff refuses to attend Macbeth's coronation
In Act 2 of Macbeth, King Duncan is murdered by Macbeth in his sleep. Lady Macbeth also kills the two sleeping guards to frame them for the murder.
Lady Macbeth totally sucks Macbeth's dick right now.
In Act 2 Scene 1, Macbeth is onstage and Lady Macbeth is not. I think Macbeth in Act 1 Scene 5 is heading back to his castle called "Inverness" to talk to his wife (Lady Macbeth) about what happened with the witches and to come back from the war that just happened. Possibly you were thinking of Act 2 Scene 2 where she is talking and he is stabbing Duncan.
The murder takes place offstage, after the end of Act II Scene I but before Macbeth re-enters near the beginning of Scene II. If the action is viewed as being continuous, it must be while Lady M is saying "That which hath made them drunk hath made me bold."
In his dreams. Macbeth does not kill Macduff, it's the other way around. Macduff kills Macbeth at the end of Act V, at the end of the play. It is interesting that, although Macbeth is based (extremely loosely) on a historical character, there was no historical Macduff.
In Macbeth's soliloquy in act 2 scene 1, Macbeth imagines that a dagger is leading him to the place where he is to kill King Duncan. This is an example of the power of Macbeth's imagination and how easily it can take over.
In Act 2, Scene 1 of Macbeth, the king, Duncan, is in a pleasant and gracious mood. He comments on the beauty of Macbeth's castle and expresses gratitude towards Lady Macbeth for hosting him.
It depends what part of the play you are talking about. Macbeth is a wonderful play because the main characters do not have a fixed character profile. What they do in Act 2 changes them forever. Killing someone while they sleep was out of character for Macbeth in Act 2 but would not be in Act 4.
Duncan's death technically occurs off-stage, in Act 2 between Scenes 1 and 2. Macbeth states at the end of 1.1 "I go, and it is done. The bell invites me./Here it not, Duncan, for it is a knell/That summons thee to heaven or to hell." (1.1.63-65) When 2.2 opens, Macbeth has already killed Duncan, and is giving the news to Lady Macbeth.
One example of violence in Macbeth is Macbeth's murder of King Duncan in Act 2, Scene 2. Macbeth's ambitious desire to become king drives him to commit this heinous act, illustrating the destructive consequences of unchecked ambition and the violence that can arise from it.