0
What else can I help you with?
Where is Case Western located?
Case Western is located in the state of Ohio.
What is most related to the Northern Securities Case?
The railroad industry is the most closely related to the Northern Securities case.
What is most closely related to the Northern Securities Case?
The railroad industry is the most closely related to the Northern Securities case.
What most closely related to the Northern Securities case?
The railroad industry is the most closely related to the Northern Securities case.
What industry is most closely related to the Northern Securities Case?
The railroad industry is the most closely related to the Northern Securities case.
Can state police investigate a state case?
Yes,a state police can investigate a state case.
If the state and Federal government have a depute what court will handle the case?
The most likely first step would be a hearing before the U.S. DIstrict Court for the Federal District in which the state is located.
Was the Louise Woodward case federal or state?
state case held in Massachusetts
How do you acquire abandoned railroad property?
You have asked an interesting and complex question. The status of title to railroad land varies from state to state. There is no universal answer due to the various ways by which developing railroads first acquired title. Those can include the following:congressional grant in federal or state public landstaking of fee interest by eminent domaintaking of easement by eminent domainfee deed from fee ownereasement deed from fee ownerWhether or not the land can be claimed by adverse possession depends on other factors that include the following:If the land was taken or conveyed specifically for the purposes of maintaining a railway system the land may revert to the original abutters when it is no longer used for railroad purpose.If the land was acquired through a congressional grant or state grant it cannot be acquired through adverse possession.In states where railroad land can be acquired by adverse possession the time period required to perfect a claim is sometimes lengthened. In some states only lands that were used for certain purposes can be claimed. In some states there must be an abandonment and the requirements for abandonment are set forth in statutory and case law. In some states mere non-use is not considered an abandonment.Requirements for adverse possession of "wild land" such as railroad ROWs are more stringent in some states where simply fencing in the desired land for grazing may not be adequate.In some jurisdictions encroaching on railroad land is against the law.In some states railroad property cannot be acquired through adverse possession.Many states have a right of first refusal in railroad property.Extensive title research must be performed to determine the status of the title owned by the railroad.Adverse possession of railroad land is a specialty area of law. You need to consult with an expert in conveyancing and railroads who can review your situation and explain your options under the statutory and case law in your state and federal statutory and case law.
Who has the power to declare a martial law in case of a state emergency?
The Governor of a state or the Present of the U.S. has the power to declare martial law in case of a state emergency. Either case is debatable in the U.S. Constitution and the state's Constitution.
If a state is party to a case the Constitution provides that original jurisdiction shall be in?
The constitution does not provide specifically for jurisdiction when a State is party to any state case. When the state is party to a case filed in FEDERAL court then that case is heard in the federal district court in that state. Every state has at least one, some have more. There are 6 federal district courts in the USA. This includes one in each territory to include DC and Puerto Rico. If the case is a state based case (filed under that state's law) then procedurally that state will hear the case.
What was the Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v Chicago (1897) about?
The Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Chicago (1897) was a landmark Supreme Court case concerning the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause. The case arose when the city of Chicago condemned a portion of the railroad's property for public use without providing just compensation, leading the railroad to challenge the city's actions. The Supreme Court ruled that the state must provide just compensation when taking private property for public use, reinforcing the principle that government actions impacting private property must adhere to constitutional guarantees. This decision helped clarify the balance between public interests and private property rights.
