I don't know and I made the question
If enough nuclear plants are built, yes
No look what happened to japan in the tsunami no i say no no no no
China has a number of nuclear plants. Which one do you mean?
Plants built today will have a lifetime of 60 years. Is that "long-run" in your terms?
In the 1970's
tis type of energy plant is expensive to built is. is it solar , nuclear or both
Yes, yes, yes. Probably safer designs should be developed than current ones, but absolutely yes.
Terrain hardly comes into it. However nuclear plants should not be built in earthquake zones, and they need adequate cooling water (like any power plant does)
Nuclear power plants need a source of cooling. Water is the usual source of cooling, and lots of it, making a desert location unrealistic.
Large towers are built to provide water to keep equipment cool.
Yes, if more plants are built.
In many countries nuclear plants are situated on the coast, for plentiful cooling water, so these would be vulnerable to tsunamis. If flooded the back-up cooling system could be affected, so if there is a perceived risk, based on history probably, in the area of the plant, protection against flooding should be built in to that design.