There is no mention of Jewish eunichs in the Book of Esther.
King Xerxes of Persia castrated eunuchs primarily to ensure their loyalty and eliminate any potential threat to his power. By removing their ability to father children, he made them less likely to establish rival factions or dynasties. Eunuchs often held significant positions in the royal court, and their castration reinforced their dependence on the king for their status and livelihoods. This practice was common in various ancient cultures to control and utilize individuals in specific roles without the risk of familial ambitions.
No. He made himself a eunuch for the kingdom of heaven's sake: Matthew 19.12. For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from [their] mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive [it], let him receive [it].
The concerns of the Nazis with regard to schools were to eliminate Jewish teachers, Jewish students, and any books with Jewish authors.
Xerxes
Well, honey, Queen Esther and King Xerxes didn't have any children together. Esther was actually married to King Xerxes, but she didn't pop out any little princes or princesses for him. So, to put it simply, their royal crib was child-free.
Xerox Also Xerxes and executrix.
Xerxes I, who ruled from 486 to 465 BCE did not have any allies outside of his empire. Rather than allying with other empires, he conquered and subjugated them.
Xerxes didn't cricify Leonidas. After he was killed in battle he had his head impaled on a pike. There is no record of any outcome of this act. Xerxes lost his war because of defeat in the sea battle of Salamis which had nothing to do with Leonidas.
Yes, there are 20 of them.
There is no biblical or historical evidence to suggest that Queen Esther had a stepson. In the Book of Esther, she is primarily known for her marriage to King Ahasuerus (Xerxes I) and her role in saving the Jewish people. The text does not mention any children from this union or any mention of a stepson. Therefore, any claims about her having a stepson are not supported by the scriptural account.
There is no surname that is used only by Jews. There are many surnames that are used both by Jews and non-Jews. Therefore, any surname that is used by a Jewish family is Jewish, and any surname that is used by a non-Jewish family is not Jewish. So any surname can be both Jewish and non-Jewish at the same time.
Eunuchs were males deprived of testes or external genitals and then the title of a specific government office (Gen. 37:36 and 39:1 refer to a married man), so that any specific usage can refer to one or both definitions. Eunuchs were excluded from serving as priests (Lev. 21:20) and from membership in the congregation of Israel (Deut. 23:1). Eunuchs were regarded as especially trustworthy in the Ancient Near East and thus were frequently employed in royal service. The Greek term translated eunuch is literally one in charge of a bed, a reference to the practice of using eunuchs as keepers of harems (Esther 2:3,6,15).