From an airplane
From the top of the Empire State building
They would fall at the same speed - in a vacuum.
Airplane, and Empire state building.
In a vacuum chamber. C. On the moon.
In a vacuum chamber. C. On the moon.
Because you didn't throw it hard enough.
No, the wool would absorb some of the energy, making the bowling ball less effective for its purpose.
then you would not be able to grib the ball
from an airplane and from the top of the Empire State Building
In a vacuum chamber. C. On the moon.
In a vacuum chamber. C. On the moon.
In a vacuum chamber. C. On the moon.
No but if it was a wrecking ball that would be a different story
It can mean a few different things: - I'm bringing you a napkin (using the "usted" form, which is a formal "you"). - I bring you a napkin (again using the "usted" form). - I'm bringing him a napkin. - I'm bringing her a napkin. In the last two, the indirect object (who would be receiving the napkin) isn't stated, although it's perfectly correct to say the sentence in this way. It's more likely that the person receiving the napkin is you based on the context clues (likely a situation where someone is serving someone else food).
The napkin will get wet and will form water vapor.
yes, since the forces are acting on just one body, the mass (m) in the equation F=ma is not changing, which would mean that the two accelerations (a) would have to be different. If the two accelerations are different then there is total acceleration in one direction (the resultant acceleration).
Bowling Alley Bowling Alley
A bowling ball would be considered a sphere.
the napkin will probably soak up more mainly because of its size
We call it a "napkin".