The nucleus of a living cell. Any cell would do, unless you wanted some specific species' DNA.
A forensic scientist would use a method like PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) to amplify the DNA sample, creating more copies for analysis. They would then use DNA sequencing techniques to compare the sample to a suspect's DNA profile or a DNA database to identify a match. This process helps determine the source of the DNA sample and link a suspect to the crime scene.
Yes, because each DNA is unique and and the scientist can just match the DNA up with andother DNA.
The forensic scientist can assume that the number of adenine molecules in the DNA sample is equal to the number of thymine molecules, as adenine always pairs with thymine in DNA. This is known as Chargaff's rule. By determining the number of thymine molecules, the scientist can indirectly infer the number of adenine molecules present in the DNA sample.
That would probably be polymerase chain reaction or PCR for short.
you would need a forensic scientist to test a DNA sample. They help in the process of solving crimes and testifying in court. They usually stay in the lab at the sheriffs department and examine DNA samples. They can also find a person to be innocent from a crime or guilty.
If the DNA sample was not cut into fragments before being run on a gel, it would appear as a single band or smear across the gel depending on the size and integrity of the DNA molecules. The band would be thick and continuous, representing the entire intact DNA sample.
Exactly, because a red blood cell has no nucleus and therefore no DNA
do a polymeras chain reaction (PCR). apex
geneticists studies genetics so i would think that applies to DNA
Soil
I am not sure of the answer but I know a scientist who would be glad to answer it!
mitochondrial sample