Sometimes, buildings weakened by an earthquake, then it would collapse during a aftershock.
This works on the same phenomenon as the shock absorbers that the cars have. Also, it would be same as a spring.
In a way, Yes. A triangle is a very strong shape, and any force that is set onto it is usually dealt with. But it wouldn't be practical. Earthquake proof houses usually have strong foundations, or are made to move with the land when an earthquake occurs. So, it would be okay, but in a sentence, it wouldn't be very nice to live in, imagine the size of the attic. :3
The Mercalli scale would most likely be used to measure earthquake damage.
A 7.8 magnitude earthquake would be considered major and have the potential to cause widespread damage. Buildings, bridges, and infrastructure could be significantly impacted, leading to casualties and disruptions to communities. Tsunamis may also be triggered depending on the location of the earthquake.
The Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale is typically used to assess the level of earthquake damage to homes and other buildings. The scale assigns a value based on observed effects and is used to quantify the intensity of shaking at a specific location during an earthquake.
The Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale is commonly used to assess earthquake damage to buildings and structures. This scale measures the intensity of shaking felt at a given location and categorizes the damage caused based on a set of criteria.
An 8.25 magnitude earthquake on the Richter Scale is considered very powerful. It has the potential to cause widespread devastation, including buildings collapsing, landslides, and tsunamis in coastal areas. The impact would be significant and could result in loss of life and extensive damage to infrastructure.
An earthquake with a magnitude of 10.0 would have catastrophic consequences, including widespread destruction of buildings and infrastructure, massive loss of life, and long-lasting economic and social impacts. The shaking would be extremely intense, causing buildings to collapse, landslides, and tsunamis. Recovery efforts would be challenging and costly, with communities struggling to rebuild and recover from the devastation.
It would depend on where is happened. In an unpopullated area, the damage would be minimal. In a populated area like the case of the recent Japan earthquake, they had almost total devastation with a 9. Earthquake.
A 10.0 earthquake would be catastrophic, causing widespread devastation with buildings collapsing, infrastructure damage, and loss of life. It would trigger tsunamis, landslides, and aftershocks that could exacerbate the destruction. Recovery efforts would be extensive and long-term.
how can studying earthquake damaged help designers improve future construction is by understanding what would you need and to build this or that building to prevented damaged building