Jeff Lichtman favors an observational approach to Biology, which is not common in his field of study.
deductive
Jeff Lichtman favors the approach of studying neuronal circuits at the level of fine details and connections, rather than focusing on overall functions or behavior. This approach, known as connectomics, involves mapping every single connection between neurons in a given circuit, which is not commonly done in neuroscience research.
Interpretivist anthropologists tend to favor qualitative research approaches that prioritize understanding and interpreting the meanings individuals ascribe to their behaviors, beliefs, and experiences. They often rely on methods such as participant observation, interviews, and narratives to delve into the cultural significance of human actions and expressions.
Revisonists
Qualitative research has special appeal to investigators who favor interpretivist or constructivist theoretical approaches. These approaches focus on understanding the subjective experiences and meanings that individuals attach to their social world, which aligns well with the in-depth and exploratory nature of qualitative research methods.
Revisionists....you doing history homework too lol
Revisionists....you doing history homework too lol
Revisionists....you doing history homework too lol
The word "favor" can be a countable noun (e.g., "I did him a favor") or an uncountable noun (e.g., "She asked for a favor").
No, I'm not.
The GCF is 1.
"Por" in this context basically means "as" - so, it literally means something like "as a favor". So, it would mean "Could you do this as a favor for me?", though it is usually translated as "Please", since it is more common in English to say that. On the other hand, "para favor" or, more gramatically correct, "para el favor" would mean "for the favor", which doesn't make much sense, since you are expected to do a favor to benefit a person, not to do something to benefit the favor!