Warhammers are probably more devastating because they deliver the force more directly and to a smaller area, but maces are quite devastating too. Either will kill an unarmored man.
swords, shield's, bows, catapults, ballistas, spears, javelins, axes, maces, warhammers, tridents, nets and depending on the era and region siege weapons like elephants, cannons and trebuchets
Medieval European Knights used a LOT of weapons. They most often used broadswords, halberds, crossbows, morning stars, and warhammers, though they also used longbows, lances, maces, and various axes. Every knight had a sword, including, longswords, broadswords, greatswords, and the occasional claymore.
yes yes they are
Conan - 2010 She Maces Me She Maces Me Not 2-64 was released on: USA: 19 March 2012 Finland: 27 March 2012
because it maces more money
Maces in Mesopotamia were made from materials like copper, bronze, or stone. These maces were crafted by skilled artisans and metalworkers within the region. Metal maces were often created using techniques such as casting, forging, and shaping.
they used iron weapons such as iron spears and arrows and chariots. they used swords, battle-axes, chariots, spears, warhammers, clubs and knifes
Yes, warhammers were indeed used in historical battles. They were popular weapons during the medieval period and were effective for crushing armor and causing blunt force trauma to opponents.
Depends on the mace. Ceremonial maces have many but no two are alike. Weapon maces have none.
Maces
The attack on Pearl Harbor was more devastating in the amount of deaths than 9/11.
clubs truncheons maces